Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: w1n1

I’m actually kind of surprised the British didn’t drop the Sten—which had wildly varying quality of build depending on who built the gun—in favor of the M3 “grease gun,” which was a better submachine gun even with the issues with the magazine.


7 posted on 01/02/2017 6:53:29 AM PST by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RayChuang88

What I know of the Sten gun was it was not a very well designed and well functioning weapon.


8 posted on 01/02/2017 6:58:11 AM PST by jmacusa (Election 2016. The Battle of Midway for The Democrat Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: RayChuang88

Everyboy talks about the STEN, but the gold standard was the sterling.

CC


34 posted on 01/02/2017 10:46:50 AM PST by Celtic Conservative (CC: purveyor of cryptic, snarky posts since December, 2000..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: RayChuang88

The Sten gun was a last ditch weapon for the British fearing the Nazis would cross the Channel after the fall of France. The Sten was cheap, unlike the much more refined Thompson, so the Brits kept producing them.


36 posted on 01/03/2017 6:31:31 AM PST by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson