Posted on 11/04/2016 11:46:39 AM PDT by Starman417
First things first. One must bear in mind that the Justice Department is utterly and completely corrupt. It began with the DOJ scuttling the investigation into the Black Panther voter intimidation case.
There was outrage over the decision among Congressional Republicans, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, and in the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division—especially after it was learned one of the defendants who walked was Jerry Jackson, a member of Philadelphia's 14th Ward Democratic Committee and a credentialed poll watcher for the Democratic Party last Election Day.Eric Holder stonewalled the investigation into Fast and FuriousThen the Washington Times reported on July 30 that six career lawyers at Justice who had recommended continuing to pursue the case were overruled by Associate Attorney General Thomas Perrelli—a top administration political appointee. One of the career attorneys, Appellate Chief Diana Flynn, had urged in an internal memo that a judgment be pressed against the defendants to "prevent the paramilitary style intimidation of voters" in the future.
Holder’s problem is that most Americans will see the difference between 7,600 and 140,000. Somewhere in those withheld documents are answers to the questions Issa keeps asking: Who authorized this program? Who in Washington approved these ill-advised and possibly illegal tactics?The IRS admitted to targeting conservatives in the 2012 election, yet absolutely no one was held accountable for it. It was found that the IRS Chief Counsel was involved and still nothing. obama met with Wilkins two days before the enhanced targeting criteria for conservatives were instituted. The DOJ saw nothing wrong with any of this.Who’s accountable?
It’s clear those answers won’t come from the attorney general, even as he expresses regret for the deaths of Terry and the hundreds of Mexicans killed by Fast and Furious weapons. Holder’s statements on what he knew and when have evolved repeatedly as new documents disproved previous sworn statements.
obama has repeatedly declined to enforce the existing laws of this country:
Conservatives were angry when Janet Napolitano announced the administration would stop deporting certain undocumented immigrants, but they should have seen it coming. On issue after issue — gay rights, drug enforcement, Internet gambling, school achievement standards — the administration has chosen to achieve its goals by a method best described as passive-aggressive.Curt wrote a post about this in 2011. The Department of Justice sees nothing wrong with a President failing to execute his oath of office.Rather than pushing new laws through a divided Congress to enact his agenda, Obama is relying on federal agencies to ignore, or at least not defend, laws that some of his important supporters — like Hispanic voters and the gay community — don’t like.
“If the president says we’re not going to enforce the law, there’s really nothing anyone can do about it,” University of Pennsylvania constitutional law professor Kermit Roosevelt said. “It’s clearly a political calculation.”
The Department of Justice shook down big banks for their alleged involvement in the housing scandal, but rather than reimburse the victims of the scandal the obama regime diverted the money to various left wing groups such as La Raza.
“In effect, the government has ordered the nation’s largest bank to create a massive slush fund for Democrat special interests,” states the editorial which reveals that radical Democrat activist groups stand to collect millions from Holder’s record deal with Bank of America. “The recession has dried up funding for such groups. But Holder’s massive bank shakedown could rebuild their war chests in a hurry.” The piece also points out that Holder has brokered other similar deals that will provide more back-door funding for the Democrat groups. They include a $13 billion agreement with JPMorgan Chase and a $7 billion deal with Citibank.Under Loretta Lynch the DOJ has waded even deeper into the muck. She met with Bill Clinton just prior to James Comey announcing that he would recommend no charges be brought against hillary clinton- based on a fatally compromised investigation that was stymied by Lynch.
(Excerpt) Read more at floppingaces.net ...
If they try, it will create an ugly backlash.
What matters a lot is what side the military is going to join, if all this happens and a CW breaks out.
The “Russians have hacked the election” meme will be used, judging from the media stories starting to come out more and more...
Electoral College selects the President. Inconclusive EV means Congress selects the President. All else failing, Speaker of the House becomes Acting President. The President has no role whatsoever. None.
Obama remaining as a decision maker makes him the leader of a revolution, not a president. Do people really think the Treasury will issue checks to federal employees on the say so of a coup leader, or will they issue checks on the authorization of the Acting President?
You will see the worst “take no prisoners” civil war ever!!!
There is nothing ‘neo’ about a Marxist.
They are, and continue to be, what they have always been...............Marxist.................
If Trump wins the election and they try to carry out a palace coup there will be real no hyperbole civil war. The game will be up for the existing status quo.
Unless they kill Trump right off the bat he will NOT go along with any such nonsense. He will have my backing 110%.
I would put nothing past them.
It’s as if 8 years was NOT ENOUGH for them.... and there is no need for two parties in America.
WTF!!
That’s NOT how it works!
bttt
If so, the kenyan/indonesian severely underestimates how pissed off the people are.
Good to know!
The French Judiciary, under the uncertain rule of Louis XVI, was swept away in the storm that overtook Paris in the French Revolution, when the draconian National Convention called Louis forth and charged him with grave crimes against the people.
The conclusion was forgone, as all the lawyers that were supposed to defend the royal prerogatives were themselves condemned before this same tribunal, ending up by being either imprisoned, at the directive of Robespierre, sent to the guillotine, or being forced into positions of little consequence.
It was a time of harsh realities.
We should call it what it is: PUMP OUT THE CESSPOOL.
BTTT!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.