Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I don’t know about this particular business combination being all that bad. As I understand it, Time-Warner owns programming; AT&T needs content for distribution. Time-Warner doesn’t own network type operations which disseminate political opinion.

I realize that the concentration of media power is a big problem, politically and culturally. But, I’m not sure this proposed merger is. I’ll reserve my opinion until more info comes out.


4 posted on 10/24/2016 5:41:49 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Pearls Before Swine
"I don’t know about this particular business combination being all that bad. As I understand it, Time-Warner owns programming; AT&T needs content for distribution. Time-Warner doesn’t own network type operations which disseminate political opinion."

Time Warner has a cable company and ISP. They are small compared to AT&T, but it's there with millions of customers.

Time Warner owns multiple entities that distribute political content and opinion...most prominently CNN.

Oh, and right now AT&T buys content from every network without favoritism. Because they have no business interest in any of it. That would change with this deal.

9 posted on 10/24/2016 6:01:22 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Pearls Before Swine

I have the TWC Bundle. It’s gone out 4 times in the last 10 days. When that happens, I’m completely isolated as I don’t have a cell phone.


11 posted on 10/24/2016 6:11:32 PM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra (Don't touch that thing Don't let anybody touch that thing!I'm a Doctor and I won't touch that thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson