Presidential election the ultimate jury trial

The Quad Cities Dispatch-Argus ^ | September 30, 2016 | John Donald O'Shea

[2ndDivisionVet]

I recently received and watched a 16.6 minute YouTube video featuring Dr. Ted Noel, the former director of NovaMed Surgery Center in Orlando, Fla.

Dr. Noel states up front that he is not Hillary Clinton's medical doctor, has not examined her, and that he is not a Hillary Clinton supporter. Based on videos of Hillary Clinton since 2005, he concludes that she suffers from Parkinson's Disease, and for that reason, that she is unfit to serve as president.

Snopes writes to debunk what Dr. Noel has said; they could be correct. But watch Dr. Noel's video yourself: You judge: youtube.com/watch?v=Zr1IDQ2V1eM

Hillary Clinton is 68 years of age. In her Sept. 26 debate with Donald Trump she looked healthy. She evidenced none of the problems shown in Dr. Noel's video. Her own doctor, who treated her after the 9/11 incident, states that her stumble/collapse into the limo on that date was caused by pneumonia....

[SharpRightTurn]

“Snopes writes to debunk what Dr. Noel has said”

Snopes—the last hope of leftist dopes.

[aquila48]

“Presidential election the ultimate jury trial”

Apropos “jury trial”, I’ve been thinking about the presidential debate and the current completely biased and pathetic selection of the moderators.

How about having 2 moderators in each debate, each picked by one of the candidates. This would be much fairer and more like a jury trial where we the people are the jury, and both candidates have a person to act as their advocate and prosecutor.

There could be a third person, a judge, a referee, to keep order according to the pre-agreed-to rules.

[JimSEA]

This is one of those tangled messes typical of the Clintons where all we can say for sure is that “If she is sick, it will get worse and more obvious.”

[rissole]

This is one of those tangled messes typical of the Clintons where all we can say for sure is that “If she is sick, it will get worse and more obvious.”

I think we should all be praying that this will happen. I certainly am. Not out of hate for her as a person, but out of hate for her evil plans.

[rissole]

How about having 2 moderators in each debate, each picked by one of the candidates. This would be much fairer and more like a jury trial where we the people are the jury, and both candidates have a person to act as their advocate and prosecutor.

Sounds like a great idea. But do you really think the crooked debate coordinators would ever agree to this? ;)

But something clearly has to change. If there's no other recourse, then conservatives should just boycott debates.

In general, though, I would say that debates rarely favor the cause of truth. Why? Because we should, as Mark Twain said, "Never argue with stupid people. They will bring you down to their level and then beat you with experience."

Debating/arguing with liberals is definitely arguing with "stupid" people. It's like casting pearls before swine, and Christ warned against that.

[JimSEA]

Ditto.

[TheCipher]

Snopes writes to debunk what Dr. Noel has said

So, those ultra lib husband and wife who are Snopes ( run the site from their home ) now have a medical degree ?

[Jumper]

Hillary is very young to have the nasal drip that is uncontrollable. As the body breaks down, should you live that long which is usually into your mid-seventies, you may well start to drip, drip, drip - kinda like the thousands of emails.

[aquila48]

The proposal I suggested would not be a strict debate - more like a light version of a trial, where both candidates would be grilled by the best that the other has to offer. Also both candidates would be offered by their chosen interrogator the opportunity to present their strengths.