YOUR New INTERNET: DID YOU WANT DOG CHOPS WITH THAT?

Canada Free Press ^ | 09/30/16 | Jeffrey A. Friedbergy

[Sean_Anthony]

A false Matrix of made-up reality, distractive entertainment, hat tricks, deception, misdirection, and lies

“If God didn’t want them sheared, he would not have made them sheep.” —Calvera, The Magnificent Seven

“HONG KONG, Sept. 30 (UPI) — An anti-Kim Jong UN rally was held in a Chinese city but photographs of the protest were promptly deleted by Chinese government censors, according to the Chinese-language press.” Breitbart.com

So. Is this how it will begin when they slice and dice your Internet?

A little here and a little there and pretty soon you’re talking about real barbecue.

[Starboard]

The Democrats will be able to blame the Republican congress when things go haywire on the Internet. The GOP blows it again.

[originalbuckeye]

THE REPUBLICANS IN CONGRESS DIDN’T CARE ENOUGH ABOUT THE AMERICAN CITIZENRY TO VOTE THIS DOWN. REPLACE THEM WITH REPUBLICANS WHO ARE INTERESTED IN WHAT THE AMERICAN CITIZENRY WANTS.

[ETL]

"DID YOU WANT DOG CHOPS WITH THAT?"

Yes, please. With a side of grasshopper.

"The Daily Caller noted that in President Obama's best-selling memoir, Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance, the president recalls being fed dog meat as a young boy in Indonesia with his stepfather, Lolo Soetoro.

"With Lolo, I learned how to eat small green chill peppers raw with dinner (plenty of rice), and, away from the dinner table, I was introduced to dog meat (tough), snake meat (tougher), and roasted grasshopper (crunchy)," the president wrote. "Like many Indonesians, Lolo followed a brand of Islam that could make room for the remnants of more ancient animist and Hindu faiths.

He explained that a man took on the powers of whatever he ate: One day soon, he promised, he would bring home a piece of tiger meat for us to share.""

http://abcnewsradioonline.com/politics-news/obama-ate-dog-meat-as-a-boy.html

[Karl Spooner]

[dainbramaged]

I emailed my democrat congressman yesterday and this came today:
Thank you for sharing your concerns about transitioning the management of internet domain address indexing from the United States government to the private sector. I appreciate you taking the time to share your thoughts with me.
I understand that a strong economy relies on the freedom of information, a free society, and the importance of honoring and maintaining American’s constitutional right to free speech. I believe that a free and open internet is vital to promoting innovation and economic development.
As you may know, the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA), an entity operated on behalf of the United States Department of Commerce, plays a key role in keeping the internet running smoothly. With roots dating back to the 1970s, it is one of the oldest organizations associated with the internet. The main job of IANA is to coordinate and maintain the protocols and addressing systems that govern the free and open internet.
Over the past few decades, Presidents from both sides of the aisle have expressed interest in transitioning oversight of IANA’s functions to the California-based nonprofit Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN). That transition has been ongoing throughout the Clinton, Bush, and Obama administrations.
I have heard concerns that this transition could lead to a louder voice in the room for authoritarian governments, and could jeopardize the commitment of the internet to the freedom of speech and ideas. Some folks have suggested that the best course of action is to demand that IANA remains under the control of the Department of Commerce.
I believe that it’s quite likely that the transition of these functions to a nonprofit organization undermines the position of authoritarian governments. The best defense against censorship of the internet and governmental control over digital content is to ensure that final authority over the administration of the address system is not in the hands of any governmental entity. Freedom from governmental interference in the management of the Internet’s core functions is the best way to guarantee freedom of speech and our cherished values.
I will be sure to keep your thoughts in mind as Congress debates these issues in the future. I encourage you to continue to share your views with me on this topic or any other issue. Thank you for reaching out. It is an honor to serve as your representative.
Sincerely, Derek Kilmer
Member of Congress
State of Washngton, 6th District

[Vendome]

[Vendome]

[Biggirl]

Here is the future alternate:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3475203/posts

[SkyDancer]

[DownInFlames]

What is the IP for FR?

[SkyDancer]

Don’t know.

[CincyRichieRich]

Moderator it would be a good idea as of tomorrow morning to post on the front page a few popular IP addresses including this one...and keep it there.