Posted on 09/02/2016 5:33:03 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Hillary Clinton and the Democrats and a considerable number of Republican summer soldiers who play can you top this with each other to see who can say the most hateful things about their partys nominee thought they had Donald Trumps number.
He was ignorant, a blustery racist, a blowhard bigot and maybe even guilty of mopery, a little bit crazy and unable to learn from his mistakes. He wouldnt take the advice of anyone and he would be buried under a landslide for Hillary Clinton. No foreign leader would deign to talk to him, because he wouldnt know what to say, anyway. The polls would soon reflect the dimensions of the anticipated landslide.
Hillary and the naysayers were clearly flummoxed that President Enrique Pena Nieto of Mexico invited the Donald to meet him at Los Pinos, the presidential palace in the Chapultepec Forest in central Mexico City, and the Republican nominee quickly accepted. He not only braved the anger and contempt The New York Times said he would find there, but was treated respectfully, seriously and as if the president of Mexico thinks he might well be the next president of the United States. (Hell entertain Hillary later.)
Mr. Trump, for his part, acted presidential, speaking respectfully of both his host and his hosts country, further infuriating the Never Trumpers. He did not back away from his criticism, blunt and always offered with the bark on, that uncontrolled immigration from Latin America is more than the United States should and would tolerate. America, like Mexico and all other nations, has the right to protect its borders and the right to preserve its culture, traditions and history. There would soon be a new day in Washington...
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
This is exactly what Krauthammer said - and he’s been vitriolic against Trump. He said Trump was proactive, he ran the meeting, he ran the Photo Op afterwards, and he was very presidential.
Trump will be a capable President.
He may even be exactly what this country needs.
Washington Times?
What’s wrong with that?
I am astonished (and pleased). They have been so anti-Trump and this is a gentle article.
You are perhaps confusing the Washington Times with the Washington Post.
ah
thank you
That’s what I thought too. Had to check it twice.
The real irony is that, trying to keep up the attacks on Trump, they ended up insulting the Mexican Prez...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.