Posted on 08/24/2016 1:25:02 PM PDT by MichCapCon
Acres of shiny new Chevrolet Camaros temporarily parked outside a Lansing auto plant: temporarily because theyre being snapped up by customers almost as fast as the state-of-the-art facility can ship them out. The image may sum up the evidence assembled in a new study from the respected Fraser Institute in Canada.
Called Ontario Versus Michigan: Lessons from the Wolverine State, the report examines how the neighboring state and province have done economically before and after the dramatic business climate changes enacted in Michigan beginning in 2011. A state economic resurgence has followed in the wake of the reforms, which included an overhaul of the states business tax system, government spending restraint and adoption of a right-to-work law.
The reforms may also explain why Chevy Camaros are now being made in Lansing instead of Oshawa, Ontario, where they had been built until late 2015. Or it might have been pure coincidence that the move was announced by General Motors just eight days after right-to-work was signed into law by a Michigan governor.
Exploring possible connections like that is one good reason for Fraser examining changes between Michigan and Ontario growth rates in both overall output GDP and manufacturing output, based on data from 2000 to 2014. In short, Michigan has been doing better since these reforms were put in place, and its important for policymakers to understand whether and how much of the two things are related.
The changes sprang from the election of 2010, which gave a reform-minded Republican caucus control of the House, and a noncareer politician named Rick Snyder the governors office on the same ticket. The GOP also padded its lead in the state Senate to a two-thirds supermajority.
Snyder and legislators began by scrapping a hated gross receipts-type business tax in favor of a simpler, flatter and lighter corporate income tax. Because spending was contained the state budget was kept in balance even with a net tax cut.
In addition to the business tax changes, Fraser focused on Michigan's right-to-work law that took effect in 2013. The authors reviewed the evidence in previous studies on the economic impact of right-to-work laws, including from a 2013 Mackinac Center study. The consensus of this research is that right-to-work laws are generally associated with positive changes in such things as employment, income and state economic growth.
The third policy area Fraser examined was government spending. Michigan Gov. Snyder contained growth in state spending, debt and government employment. In contrast, in recent years the provincial government of Ontario has presided over what Fraser calls chronic budget deficits and rising public debt."
Fraser took great care in measuring the relative performances of Michigan and Ontario, making sure they werent comparing the U.S. and Canada as a whole. Their data show that Michigans positive economic changes coincided very closely with the significant state-level policy changes.
The new studys authors use careful language to avoid making cause-and-effect assertions based on a single comparison, but there is nothing unambiguous about their impeccable scholarship, or conclusion: If Ontario policymakers seek to generate a comparable boost to their overall economy, labour market and manufacturing sector, they should carefully study Michigans reform experience...
Unions trying to get RTW overturned everywhere it has passed recently.
They already look to Michigan when the need a heart bypass or elective surgery
That’s debatable. Postal unions in Canada are avowedly communist, even breaking down in Trotskyist factions.
And a machinist’s union in Ontario, rebuffed by a non-union employer who went out of business rather than unionize, went to court and FORCED the owner to go BACK into business.
Union goons are union goons, wherever they are.
It’s not the unions. It’s the insane energy costs and regulations, instituted by a government that seems destined to destroy all manufacturing in the province. Ontario ha the highest electricity rates in North America because of the government’s obsession with “green energy” which has to be subsidized in the billions. Look north if you want to see what’s coming under a Clinton regime.
That’s an interesting thought. The case could be made that Obama has pushed us past Canada in many areas. I don’t recall Parliament ever passing bills they admit they haven’t read; our destruction of the coal industry even as Canada mines the tar sands; our ridiculous transgender restroom brouhaha. Clinton will make it worse, yes, but Obama has already pushed us past our northern neighbor.
I’m surprised to hear electrical rates are high. On looking into Ontario Hydro’s performance in the last thirty years, all I can say is what a boondoggle.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.