WOW!!!! GREAT POINT!!
It is odd that the only video in an ad of a speech is one of hillary telling Indian businessmen that ending outsourcing is a non-starter. If there really are more speeches, surely someone in those audiences despises hillary enough to have say something about them.
In social media we should start making a big deal of not believing there are speeches, thus the money she got is "pay to play". Then, not releasing them becomes acknowledgement of the corruption.
that had not occurred to me but it makes sense.
Your raise an interesting point about the Goldman speeches. I have said before it is unusual that not one person from Goldman (there are thousands) has ever noted on facebook or elsewhere that it was just a “regular speech” and they don’t see what the big deal is.
You can bet someone would say something about this unless it was just a simple pay-off. Wouldn’t you think one person would remember hearing a private speech from a presidential candidate? One former employee or one disgruntled employee? I bet there are more than a few conservatives that work there so who exactly did she address?
This graphic of Hillary’s speeches is terrific.
Do you have a link for it?