Posted on 08/11/2016 3:19:01 AM PDT by ScaniaBoy
Have you noticed that it’s common practice whenever the Clintons again get caught red-handed for a large segment of the media to say the evidence has “renewed questions” about their honesty and integrity? The latest State Department email dump to Judicial Watch provided more examples…
A new batch of State Department emails released Tuesday showed the close and sometimes overlapping interests between the Clinton Foundation and the State Department when Hillary Clinton served as secretary of state.
"The documents raised new questions about whether the charitable foundation worked to reward its donors with access and influence at the State Department, a charge that Mrs. Clinton has faced in the past and has always denied."
"A fresh batch of previously-unreleased State Department emails are raising new questions about the relationship between the Clinton Foundation and the State Department during the years Hillary Clinton served as Secretary of State."
"A new batch of emails released Tuesday is raising fresh questions about whether Clinton Foundation donors got preferential treatment from the State Department during Hillary Clinton’s tenure at the top."
This kind of thing doesn’t “raise more questions” about the incestuous relationship between the Clinton Foundation and State Department under Hillary Clinton — it answers them… again.
The latest batch of emails shows Hillary’s aides at the State Department working to get someone involved with the Clinton Foundation, whose name was redacted, a State job. The Clinton Foundation also worked with State to help out foreign governments as long as they could pay it back in certain ways:
"Recall the State Department praising the progress of Nigerian President Goodluck Jonathan as the president’s ally invited Bill Clinton to give two speeches in exchange for $1.4 million dollars. The State Department’s generous assessment of Jonathan’s human rights record stopped after the last speaking gig for Clinton."
The only “question” raised by things like that is “how are they not in jail?”
When do more evidence no longer raise questions but prove guilt?
“no longer raise questions but prove guilt?”
EXACTLY!!
Hey MSM, can I get away with email fraud, voter scams, piracy on the high seas, and even murder as long as I have a “D” following my name?
Last night, I watched an “American Experience” program that featured Lyndon Johnson. This person who allegedly exposed himself to women employees and made repulsive jokes to them, bullied subordinates, had countless affairs, and this does not begin to deal with the fraud and corruption his political career was so well known for. Yet here were ones like David McCullough and Doris Kears Goodwin speaking of him in these sort of “Lion in Winter” terms. You can imagine what they think of a particular presidential candidate nowadays. What a joke.
The continuous dripping of evidence of PIAPS’s crimes raises questions, and yet nobody in the MSM can be bothered to actually seek answers to those questions. Especially to PIAPS’s face.
They’re too busy dissecting Trump’s latest “gaffe.”
When do more evidence no longer raise questions but prove guilt?
The latest emails do not raise questions , they answer question raised earlier and prove guilt.
It's simply amazing that there is far more than enough unimpeachable evidence disclosed publicly to put Hillary and her whole inner circle in jail for a long time.
It’s the same Clinton strategy that has worked for decades,deny,delay and obfuscate.
If it all came at once they would be done,but their allies cooperate in the strategy,spread it out,then people don’t even hear it anymore,we have been through this crap for decades,you would think if we had a side they would have figured this out by now.
What it all boils down to is a lot of conservatives make a lot of money being on tv,making movies,writing books telling us what we already know,breaking stories,going to be the end for the Clintons,blah, blah ,blah,what happens?
The Clintons get richer,the country gets more polarized,the welfare class grows,more corruption,the United States Of America becomes only a gaggle of Whiners,moaners,groups of
pathetic losers
House Task Force Confirms: ISIS Threat Was Altered in Intelligence Reports For Political Purposes
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2016/08/10/house-task-force-confirms-isis-threat-was-downplayed-for-political-purposes-n2203772?utm_source=thdailypm&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl_pm&newsletterad=
Answer: When the guilty party is a conservative.
But that was in the 80’s and the corrupt Reagan regime too (/channeling my msm personality).
Good find - be great if someone could confront the talking heads with this piece of history. BTW Ed Meese did resign. Not that the despicable Barney Franks ever learned anything from that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.