BREAKING: Murdered DNC staffer was Wikileaks’ source, Assange admits in interview

ChristianTimes ^ | 08/05/16 | By Admin

[proust]

You got buffaloed. See post #75.

[visualops]

Assange likes attention. to offer a rewards when no facts will be forthcoming is easy. and it deepens the mystery, and piques more interest.

[proust]

Now Gateway and Drudge are running with it.

[ConservativeMind]

No, it appears the “Christian Times” has produced another article of lies.

This is the third such lie-based article I've seen in as many postings here on Free Republic.

It is not just unreliable—it is willfully wrong.

[libertarian27]

Drudge just tweeted this: DRUDGE REPORT ‏@DRUDGE_REPORT 1m1 minute ago IT WASN'T THE RUSSIANS! http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/08/wow-breaking-video-julian-assange-suggests-seth-rich-wikileaks-dnc-source-shot-dead-dc/

[bray]

So it wasn’t the Russians.

Pray America wakes

[ConservativeMind]

No, the interview is legit and the Christian Times is lying about what Assange said in that interview.

[libertarian27]

[longtermmemmory]

don’t fret over this as the entire picture,

Ryan has a problem because Trump endorsed him and Ryan is already acting as traitor.

[Bluebird Singing]

yeah, that’s true

[mancini]

:-)

[Talisker]

Assange does NOT admit this in the interview.

Like hell. You just don't want to connect the TWO dots.

[Diogenesis]

Comey must resign,
and be indicted for MURDER before the fact.

[Diogenesis]

“America is going to need a bigger electric bench
to clean up this systematic treason.

[meatloaf]

Christian Times used a bogus doctor’s name in a story dealing with Hillary.

[little jeremiah]

The statement at the bottom left of the Christian Times has NOTHING to do with the Dutch interview.

Dutch interview with Assage on youtube, absolutely no connection with the CT site:

Julian Assange on Seth Rich
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kp7FkLBRpKg

Statement of CT:

Christian Times Newspaper is your premier online source for news, commentary, opinion, and half-baked theories. Christian Times Newspaper does not take responsibility for any of our readers’ actions that may result from reading our stories. We make it abundantly aware that some stories are satire, and some are speculation.

[Talisker]

Oh, I’m closer than 75%...I’m at 99 and 44/100ths.

[little jeremiah]

I get it. But you weren’t clear.

The CT headline should have read “Assange Insinuates etc”.

[dfwgator]

Is that Marilyn Chambers?

[Talisker]

No, it appears the “Christian Times” has produced another article of lies. This is the third such lie-based article I've seen in as many postings here on Free Republic. It is not just unreliable—it is willfully wrong.

What's wrong is your willful refusal to acknowledge what Assange is saying. This is the sixth post you've done that, all to protect killers. You're becoming downright unreliable yourself. Why is that? Why MUST Julian be wrong?

Tell us.