Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: FredZarguna

It was not US property. Fort Sumter was within the sovereign state of South Carolina. That was the very core of the issue.


35 posted on 07/07/2016 10:41:43 AM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: IronJack
Wrong. It was a fortress built by the American people, and administered by the Federal government. South Carolina had no authority under the Constitution to raise a standing army; only a militia. South Carolina specifically recognized it had no such power when it ratified the Constitution, so the fort could not belong to South Carolina.

Traitors to the United States of America shot first. Your non-answer answers to the inadequacy of your understanding and the fundamental untruthfulness of the Lost Causers about their cause.

36 posted on 07/07/2016 10:53:57 AM PDT by FredZarguna (And what Rough Beast, its hour come round at last, slouches toward Fifth Avenue to be born?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: IronJack
the land that Sumter was built upon was deeded in perpetuity to the federal government. The federal government financed the construction of the fortifications and manned it as their prerogative and right. The insurrectionists had no legitimate business going anywhere near the fort and firing upon it was a clear act of war.
38 posted on 07/07/2016 11:02:29 AM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson