SCOTUS tosses Texas abortion law, designed to prevent more Kermit Gosnell butcher shops

Canada Free Press ^ | 06/28/18 | Dan Calabrese

[Sean_Anthony]

Even basic sanitary requirements are too much for the pro-aborts to accept

With Anthony Kennedy joining the four Justices who are always liberal (as opposed to Kennedy’s liberal-when-he-feels-like-it approach to interpreting the law), the Supreme Court tossed out the very modest Texas abortion restrictions that simply required abortion clinics to meet the same safety requirements as every other medical clinic, including doctors who are sufficiently credentialed to be able to admit patients at local hospitals.

These restrictions were put in place to prevent more Kermit Gosnell-style butcher shops from springing to life. But you can forget that. Any restriction on abortion, even one designed to keep people safe (apart from fetuses, obviously) is too much for the pro-aborts and their champions on the Supreme Court:

[GraceG]

so does this ruling mean I can start an unlicensed unsafe clinic for providing facelifts and cosmetic surgery....

I mean if abortion clinics don’t need to have any sorta relationship to the actual hospitals for when they botch crap up, or actually have to follow any safety standards... then why not a “roach motel plastic surgery clinic”?

I could get a bunch of cheap doctors from India and if you die on the table, oh well...

We could provide the occasion “breast exam” before the breast implant procedure, you know so we can classify the whole sham clinic as being for “women’s health”....

You know it is all legal cause the Progressive harridans on the supreme court said so!

[T-Bone Texan]

More black-robed tyranny from the Nazis behind the bench.

Don’t they realize that in the coming civil war they are toast? Not silly pitchforks, but actually being burned to death in their homes or otherwise lynched by justifiably-enraged mobs?

That’s what they get for opposing Americans and promoting vice and vulgarity. It’s karmic.

[Amendment10]

If parents were making sure that their children were being taught the Constitution, particularly 10th Amendment-protected state sovereignty, then grade school children would probably be able to point out the following about the constitutionality of abortion.

The Founding States had made the 10th Amendment to clarify that the Constitution’s silence about issues like abortion and marriage means that such issues are automatically and uniquely state power issues, not the business of the feds.

In fact, post-FDR era, institutionally indoctrinated, state sovereignty-ignoring activst justices stole 10th Amendment-protected state powers to legislate from the bench the fictitious constitutional right to have an abortion imo.

[loveliberty2]

Consider the following:

"The God who gave us life, gave us liberty at the same time. The hand of force may destroy, but cannot disjoin them." - Thomas Jefferson, Author of the Declaration of Independence

In order to believe that "destroy(ing)" a God-given life and the Creator-endowed rights and liberties which accompany it into the world is a lawful act, then one must first rid the society of a belief in the premise outlined by Jefferson and other Founders and Framers of the Constitution.

[Jacquerie]

See, its safer to entrust our liberty to insane leftists on scotus, than to risk an Article V convention of the states.