However, when they printed out the names for the births for 1960-1964, alphabetically, if there had been a birth in January and another in August for the same name, YOU WOULD SEE TWO NAMES THE SAME.
Therefor the entry for August is a fake. And the January birth has become a DUPLICATE MAE.
Oh, I get it. So they had them listed by month at least. Of course, that makes total sense. If they take a name out, it messes up the total, so they have to have the MAE thing. Sorry, I read it so quickly I missed that sentence that made it clear.