Posted on 06/20/2016 8:47:28 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax
Frankly, I am not about to endorse revised discussion of the Reconstruction Politics in the immediate aftermath of the Civil War loss by the South to transmogrify that to some mystical relevance of Democrats and Republicans of today.
The Civil war did not even start over slavery.... maybe we should start by getting that straight.
Demoncrats ALWAYS back slavery, then and today.
AnD TODAY, the DNC backing of Islamic rape, slavery and
terror is ONLY matched by the odious, lying GOP.
Uniparty = Slavery, THEN and NOW.
It makes them part of a national unofficial identity that wanted to maintain subjugation on one part while still punishing recalcitrants on the other because of economics and power.
Had something to do with the election Lincoln, yes?
There is a point here hat I will never understand. You talk about some instances of racial segregation created by the southern democrats. I can remember a couple more. The Jim Crow Laws, the using of the count of black slaves to give southern democrats more people under their state capacity giving them more federal voting rights to continue segregation, and the efforts of the southern democrats to vote down the Equal Rights Amendments in the mid sixties. Yet blacks continue to follow them around like puppies on a leash. Why side with the continuing bigotry? red
Had something to do with the election Lincoln, yes?
But only after the first two years of war. For the first two years of the war, the Union was only fighting to stop Independence for the South. They were going to keep slaves in slavery if they had won quickly in those first two years.
People keep getting their history mixed up with propaganda.
This is a subject I discuss often. Prior to 1964, Black voters mostly voted Republican. After 1964, there was a mass Exodus of Black voters over to the Democrat party.
Now how do you suppose that happened?
I know, and I will tell you, but I wanted to hear your answer first.
LBJ Great Society poverty pimp campaign masterfully pander ed to blacks of that Era in 1964.
To wit:
“Ill have those n1ggers voting Democratic for the next 200 years. - Lyndon Baines Johnson about the Great Society plan.
RE: “After 1964, there was a mass Exodus of Black voters over to the Democrat party.”
Civil rights act of 1964. Lyndon Baines Johnson.
Why did the southern states secede?
Because according to this: (Founding document of the United States.)
"... whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. "
They had a right to do so.
They felt the existing Union no longer represented their interests.
“After 1964, there was a mass Exodus of Black voters over to the Democrat party.”
There was also a mass exodus of “Southern Dems” to Republican party.
So what are we to think?
That didn't start in 1964. That started in 1980 with Ronald Reagan.
If not slavery - the peculiar institution - then what?
In 1863, President Lincoln freed the slaves. In 1933, President Roosevelt bought them back.
If one is looking as assign blame for African Slavery, it’s home grown.
The continent was plagued by tribal conflict from its earliest days where the practice was to execute prisoners of war.
Then one enterprising Tribal lad grasped that there was money to be made in selling prisoners as slaves.
So up stepped the Arab Corsairs from Jeddah, and presto you had a transportation system.
The Portuguese, British and Americans came more than 1200 years later.
The R’s and D’s had nothing to do w/it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.