Posted on 06/17/2016 3:49:28 PM PDT by WayneDupreeShow
Edited on 06/17/2016 4:50:38 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
Yes, way to go!
To quote that great American President and ex-lawyer; “It all depends on what the meaning of is is.”
Questions?
The blogpimp claims to be the “author” of the material, nothing is stopping him from posting the whole thing.
He just wants blog hits, and to use Free Republic as a free advertising platform.
That’s pretty scummy, I’m surprised you would support such theft.
.He is saving FR band with and saving time by posting links we don’t have to search for on topics we need to know about. The material needs to get out. Or are YOU supporting the enemy, HILLARY. Which is it? Are you for saving this country or not?
You are being called names in FR mail. Few think you are doing FR a service but are making a complete fool of yourself Do yourself and all of us a favor, stop it. If Jim wants to call them out, it is HIS site, NOT yours!
Tragic.
He is saving FR band with and saving time by posting links we don’t have to search for on topics we need to know about.
That makes no sense.
The material needs to get out.
Clearly it was already "out" somewhere for this blogger to see.
Then he re-wrote it and stuck it on his blog and decided he wanted to get paid for it by linking here.
Clever little dirtbags, bloggers.
Or are YOU supporting the enemy, HILLARY. Which is it?
I'd love to see you explain how the blogpimp posting the full content here would help Hillary. Give it a shot.
I note that you keep pinging Jim, as if you were informing him of something he didn't know.. or "telling" on me. Cute.
I'll leave you with a few of Jim's words on the topic:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2636843/posts?page=557#552
"I have no complaint if a good conservative blogger posts his own material to FR, not as an excerpt to drive hits and discussion back to his blog, but rather to impart useful information to OUR readers and to promote and join in on the discussion and conservative activism HERE on FR.
If a blogger can’t or refuses do that, and if he constantly complains or fights with our participants over it, then I’d just as soon he doesn’t post here. It’s not my job to make his content or his presentation or cooperation acceptable to our readers. That’s his job. And if he cannot do it or refuses to do it and continues posting brief excerpts only and obviously attempting to draw away our participants while loudly complaining about it, then I have no sympathy for his complaints and the more apt I am to ban his account and blog."
Cheers.
Thank you Count. Have sent it on. Also to Drudge.
This is the proof needed to put Hillary behind bars. Seems that liberal’s like Podesta are trying to keep this material away from public knowledge. We know that Podesta is in her camp. He is trying to Scrub the Internet of this important incriminating material or at least keep the information from being discussed
His excuse is the material is from an email that was hacked. (One of those she had previously wiped from her destroyed server no doubt.)
Podesta has been fairly successful. (And HG is trying to help him)
I listen to the poster of this thread or his name sake on RightSide the station that supports Trump. Don’t see any difference between posting links to Rush material or any of Fox News programming then posting his material particularly material that is so important.
Crawl back under your rock loser crackpot, your constant BS is getting very tiresome.
Thanks for posting, great info!
Good and accurate post in my books.
You’re welcme!
I'm deeply hurt by your harsh words.
Deeply.
...and excerpted at that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.