Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Taxpayers Should Not Be on the Hook for Stadiums
Capitol Confidential ^ | 5/29/2016 | Jarrett Skorup

Posted on 06/01/2016 8:55:58 AM PDT by MichCapCon

Sports writer and commentator Bill Simmons is transitioning from ESPN to a new show on HBO. In his promotional, “I Believe,” the never-gun-shy Simmons lays out some of his positions.

His last statement is the most notable: “I believe billionaires should pay for their own [expletive] stadiums.”

Michigan has a bad track record in this area. State and local taxpayers have coughed up huge for stadiums for the Lions in Pontiac (and then back to Detroit), for the Tigers at Comerica, and most recently for the Red Wings’ new arena. (Well-deserved praise is due for Bill Davidson, who owned the Pistons in 1988 and financed the Palace of Auburn Hills with no tax dollars).

Stadiums are almost universally panned as bad economic development tools. Andrew Zimbalist, a professor of economics at Smith College and one of the leading experts on stadium financing, writes, “All of the independent, scholarly research on the issue of whether sports teams and facilities have a positive economic impact has come to the same conclusion: One should not anticipate that a team or a facility by itself will either increase employment or raise per capita income in a metropolitan area.”

It’s too late for these past projects, but Michigan should learn its lesson for the future.


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: sports

1 posted on 06/01/2016 8:55:58 AM PDT by MichCapCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

I’d take it a step further: equal protection and no tax incentives for any industry. No more shopping around for the city and state with the best tax deal to incentivize a company (or team) to move.


2 posted on 06/01/2016 8:57:58 AM PDT by lacrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon; All

Actually, we TAXPAYERS shouldn’t be on the hook for ANYTHING...but here’s a list of 97 ‘hidden’ taxes we pay, beyond the regular ones we’re already paying:

http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/a-list-of-97-taxes-americans-pay-every-year


3 posted on 06/01/2016 8:59:55 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

The city’s participation should be limited to waiving zoning regulations and speeding up the building permit process - no tax dollar outlays. Of course, that means no government contacts steered toward political contributors, either. :)


4 posted on 06/01/2016 9:01:07 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ([CTRL]-[GALT]-[DELETE])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon
Since the benefits accrue directly to the individual, there is no cogent argument for anyone else paying their debt.


5 posted on 06/01/2016 9:01:54 AM PDT by econjack (I'm not bossy...I just know what you should be doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

It’s the scarcity model. With more cities wanting sports teams than there are sports teams there is an incentive to bid against each other. And smart businesses don’t pay for things they don’t have to. Sure, the cities SHOULDN’T bid against each other like that, there’s no economic benefit, but explain that to them. The teams are just making smart business decisions.


6 posted on 06/01/2016 9:09:40 AM PDT by discostu (Joan Crawford has risen from the grave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: discostu

It’s just ridiculous that cities with no Mass transit, like Arlington, get all of the sports stadiums so that they can rape the fans to pay $100 for parking.

And now the Rangers are going to build a new ballpark, when the current one is only 20 years old. Insanity.


7 posted on 06/01/2016 9:11:23 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

Bread and circuses.


8 posted on 06/01/2016 9:14:53 AM PDT by Dogbert41 (All the days of my life were written in your book before there was one of them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

It is crazy. But that’s the cycle. Teams always want fancier stadiums with more nicer seats they can charge more for, and cities are lining up to give them those stadiums. Until the cities stop, it will continue. The funny part is then the cities complain, but the next chance they get they’re bidding away. We saw that recently in Glendale for Super Bowl 49, they were bitching and complaining about how much money they lost on the previous SB there, how all the NFL press stuff said it was in Phoenix, and most of the hotel nights were sold in Phoenix, including where the teams stayed. And yet nobody bothered to ask “well why’d you bid again”.


9 posted on 06/01/2016 9:20:30 AM PDT by discostu (Joan Crawford has risen from the grave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

If the taxpayers want to build a stadium, it should not be as a silent partner with the owner of a team.

If the taxpayers want to fund the building of a stadium they should get a cut of the concessions and the gate. Just like any other owner.

All to often, owners of teams want all sorts of tax breaks and infrastructure improvements without being willing to pay them back.


10 posted on 06/01/2016 9:20:52 AM PDT by Vermont Lt (Ask Bernie supporters two questions: Who is rich. Who decides. In the past, that meant who died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

They should offer bonds to fund it, otherwise it is just theft through government, no different than “wealth redistribution” to poor people - just worse.


11 posted on 06/01/2016 9:23:47 AM PDT by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing consequences of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
And now the Rangers are going to build a new ballpark, when the current one is only 20 years old. Insanity.

I'll bet the new one is going to have a roof like the one the Astros have. To me the insanity was building a baseball stadium with no roof in a state that regularly hits the high 90's and triple digit temperatures in the summertime. I guess the taxpayers will pay for the do-over.

12 posted on 06/01/2016 9:27:52 AM PDT by Sans-Culotte ('''Political correctness is communist propaganda writ small''~ Theodore Dalrymple)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: discostu
but explain that to them

Good luck with that. City councils and County commissions used to have elected officials who were professionals--accountants, bankers, MDs, business execs, etc. Now they have, as one county manager complained to me, people who can't even balance their own checkbooks.

13 posted on 06/01/2016 9:30:35 AM PDT by DeFault User
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

Sport franchises and their stadiums are nothing more than a money laundering scam to get a dollar into the pockets of politicians and cronies even if it costs the tax payer 10 dollars to do it.


14 posted on 06/01/2016 9:47:04 AM PDT by GraceG (Only a fool works hard in an environment where hard work is not appreciated...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson