Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Sir Napsalot

Socialists, like all other monopolists, desire to make the law their own weapon. And when once the law is on the side of socialism, how can it be used against socialism? For when plunder is abetted by the law, it does not fear your courts, your gendarmes, and your prisons. Rather, it may call upon them for help.

“The Law” - Frederic Bastiat

Wake up and smell the socialists, Victor. They stink. What’s your vector?


4 posted on 05/06/2016 4:43:00 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: PGalt; Sir Napsalot; petercooper; SMARTY; Gaffer; rawcatslyentist; Travis McGee; Buttons12; ...
There is the one side of it which is the selective prosecution of laws. The other side of it is also referenced by VDH in his excellent opinion piece:

"...There also is no longer a 1st Amendment on campuses or in many workplaces. Try offering a public lecture on the misguided nature of Black Lives Matter, expressing doubts about the theory of man-caused, radical global warming that might be averted by huge government programs and investment, or doubting the wisdom of traditional marriage for gay couples. It is likely that the lecture would be stormed, and the speaker shouted down—as if someone were defending the Versailles Treaty in Munich during the late 1920s, or praising Trotsky in Moscow around 1927..."

There is a thread on Free Republic titled "Angry SJW Demands Student Journalist Be Punished for Filming #Trigglypuff"

In summary, it happened at UMASS Amherst (a place I detest as a bastion of Political Correctness) where the Young Republicans Club organized a panel discussion to analyze the suppression of free speech on campuses via political correctness and other liberal mechanisms.

Interestingly enough, the panel was composed of a young homosexual man, an established feminist, and Stephen Crowder, known to all of us on FR (He is a Freeper). These three panelists would, under normal circumstances, be at each other's political throats. But they all had the same bone to pick with political correctness, and thus it was apparent, they were allies in this fight.

So when they got up on stage, the Feminist was being shouted down by the Social Justice PC people (I was puzzled by this, under normal circumstances, she would likely have been on their side) but they wouldn't let her say her introductory opening piece, interrupting her, making it nearly impossible for her to speak.

Now, I am as anti-feminist as they come (not anti-women, mind you) but I wanted to hear what she had to say, and began getting increasingly irritated with the interruptions, as was the entire panel.

When Stephen Crowder got up there, he BLASTED them with full broadsides of nine 16 inch shells of un-Politicially Correct high explosive, non-stop barrages, driving them Social Justice Warrior morons into higher and higher levels of distress, until this woman shown below had a complete melt down and temper tantrum. (Her SJW name is apparently Trigglypuff...a more diseased and mentally ill example of liberalism you will not find.) The whole thing has turned into another Internet meme:

The video of the entire panel discussion may be found here (Milo Yiannopoulos, Steven Crowder and Christina Hoff Sommers at Mass and if you don't want to watch the whole thing, you can fast forward to about the 15 min mark, where you will see the tail end of the feminist being interrupted, and Stephen Crowder (God bless him) gets on his feet and goes to work!

I grinned and laughed the entire time.

15 posted on 05/06/2016 5:45:29 AM PDT by rlmorel ("Irrational violence against muslims" is a myth, but "Irrational violence against non-muslims" isn't)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson