Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AZ: Prohibition on Fees, Taxes, or Encumbrances on the Private Sale of Firearms
Gun Watch ^ | 18 April, 2016 | Dean Weingarten

Posted on 04/22/2016 12:11:31 AM PDT by marktwain


Governor Doug Ducey of Arizona signed HB 224, which protects the right to transfer firearms in private transactions, without fee, tax or encumbrance, into law on 30 March, 2016.  The law went into effect on 31 March.

From the Governor's Office:

"This bill protects the Second Amendment freedoms of Arizonans by allowing for the exchange of firearms without assessments or penalties imposed by state and local government.”

The law is succinct and easily understood, a nice contrast with much legislation that is passed in recent times.  From cqstatetrack.com:

CHAPTER 36

PRIVATE FIREARM TRANSACTIONS

ARTICLE 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

44-7851. Definitions

In this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires:

1. "Firearm" Means any loaded or unloaded handgun, pistol, revolver, rifle, shotgun or other weapon that will expel or that is designed to or may readily be converted to expel a solid projectile by the action of expanding gases.

2. "Private party" means a person who is not a prohibited possessor under state or federal law and does not include a person who possesses a federal firearms license and who primarily engages in the business of selling, trading or purchasing firearms.

3. "Transfer" means when a person gives, loans, offers for sale, wills or in any manner offers another person a firearm for any lawful purpose and the person is not a prohibited possessor under state or federal law.

44-7852. Private party firearms transfer; state or political subdivision encumbrance prohibited This state or any political subdivision of this state may not enact or implement any additional fee, tax, assessment, lien or other encumbrance on the transfer of a firearm between two private parties who are not prohibited possessors under state or federal law.
 HB 224 passed the House with a strong 35-25 vote; then it passed the Senate with a vote of 19 to 10, was transmitted to Governor Ducey on 29 March, and signed the next day.

The Arizona transaction privilege tax does not require tax the transfer of private  goods, rather it taxes the "privilege" of transferring goods from a number of explicit businesses.  Individual sales are not considered retail sales, and are not taxed.

In response to the federal district court finding, the government of the Commonweath of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI) has passed an import tax of $1,000 per handgun.  The Arizona law was signed by Governor Ducey 13 days before Governor Torres signed the handgun tax for the CNMI.  The two approaches show two radically different approaches to Second Amendment rights.  The Arizona government celebrates and protects those rights; the CNMI government is doing everything it can to minimize and obstruct the same rights.

 ©2016 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice is included.
Link to Gun Watch


TOPICS: Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: arizona; az; banglist; privatesale; tax
The contrast between Arizona and the Mariana Islands is striking.
1 posted on 04/22/2016 12:11:31 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

We should deport all the illegal invaders to the Mariana islands and see how quickly their position on gun control changes.


2 posted on 04/22/2016 3:18:47 AM PDT by RC one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

So is the Bloomberg “background check” scheme DOA?

You gotta have a dealer perform the check and he ain’t agonna do it for free - although I’ll warrant some go-around might be figured out.


3 posted on 04/22/2016 7:48:58 AM PDT by Oatka (Beware of an old man in a profession where men usually die young.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC one
We should deport all the illegal invaders to the Mariana islands

If you don't mind, I'd rather give the WORKING, NON-CRIMINAL illegal invaders a pass and send the CRIMINAL ones along with a lot of hoodrats, EBT queens and methheads to the Marianas.

4 posted on 04/22/2016 8:17:01 AM PDT by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

They’re all felons, so yes, they are all law-breakers.


5 posted on 04/22/2016 5:02:51 PM PDT by wastedyears (I identify as an A-10 Warthog and am attracted to tanks. If you don't agree, you're otherkin phobic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

No, first-time illegals are guilty of a misdemeanor for their entry.

(WIKI entry)

The illegal entry of non-nationals into the United States is a misdemeanor according to the [[Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965|Immigration and Nationality Act]], which prohibits non-nationals from entering or attempting to enter the United States at any time or place which has not been designated by an immigration officer, and also prohibits non-nationals from eluding inspection by immigration officers.


6 posted on 04/23/2016 8:25:08 AM PDT by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

Embarrassing


7 posted on 04/23/2016 2:41:26 PM PDT by wastedyears (I identify as an A-10 Warthog and am attracted to tanks. If you don't agree, you're otherkin phobic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson