Thw Weirdest Possible Outcomes for the Strangest Elction in U.S. History

http://www.thedailysheeple.com/ ^ | April 15, 2016 | Brandon Smith

[Art in Idaho]

An interesting take on the possibilities with the upcoming election on November 8, 2016. Grab the popcorn.

Pray for America and prepare. November 8, 2016! Fight for Freedom!

[jessduntno]

“If you are a longtime activist in the Liberty Movement then you are well aware that elections do not matter in terms of the future direction our nation takes. Presidents are puppets of international financiers, and so are most legislators. Whenever a president does attempt to go against the system, he either ends up shot by a “lone gunman,” or his office is disgraced by a conveniently-leaked scandal.”

You mean Bill and Hillary were...

[Art in Idaho]

Sorrygang. Long day at work. : )

Corrected title: The Weirdest Possible Outcomes for the Strangest Election in U.S. History

What do you think? Lots of possible scenarios.

[ButThreeLeftsDo]

Nice trout, Art!

[Art in Idaho]

You mean Bill and Hillary were...

Bill was but not Golden Hillary. She's running for President!

[Art in Idaho]

Thanks! Just got back from work and a guy caught six using hoochies and squawfish meat at 100 feet.

[Art in Idaho]

One of my takes from this article is I used to think a lot of this stuff bordered on conspiracy theories, but the GOPe and the Uniparty plus Obama and his shenanigans have shown us otherwise.

[fhayek]

No matter how you slice it, it sure looks like a fuster cluck. For the political junkie, it rivals a new Stars Wars movie release to a sci-fi junkie. No matters what happens, politics will never be the same. We have jumped the shark.

[corbe]

Thanks, That was Good.

[Art in Idaho]

No matters what happens, politics will never be the same. We have jumped the shark.

Totally agree with that. With the internet and people more involved, more informed, (hopefully), more and more people are saying, "Hey, this isn't right. . They can't do that. . They're all the same. . They get to D.C. and change. . It's just one big Uniparty and a commie President." The comments. . You could go on and on. Everyone is talking politics. I said a long time ago, if Hillary gets elected, it could lead to CWII. Obama plotting another "orchestrated crisis" and martial law I and martial lawII is the biggest wildcard. I'll be sooo glad when Jan 20, 2017 arrives.

[Art in Idaho]

You’re welcome corbe! I think it’s a good summary of the possibilities. Certainly not going to be a yawn election!
I really do fear for our country if Hillary gets elected. . Hey Comey, where’s the Indictment?! Hey Loretta Lynch, are you going to sell out, or follow the Letter of the Law?

[jessduntno]

Heh heh heh ...

[Art in Idaho]

From the Ben Carson martial law article:

"Another worrying issue is that Obama has militarized almost every federal agency. In September of 2013, 70 federal agents in full body armor, carrying M-16s raided one person’s gold mining operation in a tiny Alaska town. They were from the Environmental Protection Agency looking for violations of the Clean Air Act."

"After this incident it was found that Obama had created law enforcement branches in over 70 federal agencies. It is estimated that there are over 120,000 law enforcement agents in the federal government who are not part of traditional law enforcement branches — CIA, FBI, DEA, ATF, DHS, DOJ, and Treasury Dept."

"These law enforcement branches Obama has created are not comprised of just one or two security guards. Obama has armed these agencies to the teeth. Maj. General Jerry Curry, a 40 year, decorated, military veteran, wrote an op-ed for The Daily Caller pointing out how, in addition to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administrations’ purchase of 46,000 hollow point bullets, the Social Security Administration (SSA) bought 174,000 hollow point bullets."

In reaction to these purchases, Maj. Gen. Curry said, “Hollow point bullets are so lethal that the Geneva Convention does not allow their use on the battlefield in time of war. Hollow point bullets don’t just stop or hurt people, they penetrate the body, spread out, fragment and cause maximum damage to the body’s organs. Death often follows. Potentially each hollow nose bullet represents a dead American. If so, why would the U.S. government want the SSA to kill 174,000 of our citizens, even during a time of civil unrest? Or is the purpose to kill 174,000 of the nation’s military and replace them with Department of Homeland Security (DHS) special security forces, forces loyal to the Administration, not to the Constitution?”

Curry goes on, “In the war in Iraq, our military forces expended approximately 70 million rounds per year. In March (of 2012) DHS ordered 750 million rounds of hollow point ammunition. It then turned around and ordered an additional 750 million rounds of miscellaneous bullets including some that are capable of penetrating walls. This is enough ammunition to empty five rounds into the body of every living American citizen.”

Time left until Obama leaves office 278 Days. . Are we going to make it?

[null and void]

At no point in history has any government ever wanted its people to be defenseless for any good reason ~ nully's son

The biggest killer of mankind

Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping!

To get onto The Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping List you must threaten to report me to the Mods if I don't add you to the list...

“We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.” Barack Hussein Obama, 7/2/2008

They don’t call it a Civil Defense force, that would imply we need (or perhaps that we deserve) defense. The official name is National Civilian Community Corps.

I think of it as the NatCCC, or more simply, as the NatCs...

[SaveFerris]

[ Time left until Obama leaves office 278 Days. . Are we going to make it? ]

I’ll be surprised if something significant doesn’t happen. I have a feeling it will be disguised as a(n) __________ (don’t want to say because I don’t want to give them ideas). I’ll send my thoughts to nully who will keep it private; I trust him.

As I’ve said before, let’s see if I’m completely-wrong. It would be best if I am wrong. Totally-wrong.

I don’t think the TPTB want their cash ATM to be at risk. Hillary would protect that, so the GOPe put up the stooge Jeb who still can’t figure out why nobody liked him.

[JimSEA]

“Given the already seething angst between supporters of Trump, Cruz, Sanders and Clinton, any railroading of a candidate at the conventions, whether real or fabricated for effect, could very well result in internal violence spilling into open riots. Some candidates, including Trump, have suggested this will be the ultimate outcome. I tend to agree. The divisions between Americans are so pronounced now that I would be shocked if people did not react emotionally to a brokered or stolen convention. This would also be a fantastic method to continue the distraction of the public away from greater problems.”

This leading to a low intensity civil war will the likely outcome.

[Art in Idaho]

I think of it as the NatCCC, or more simply, as the NatCs...

Yeah, that's a whole other area we don't really know much about. How 'deep' does this National Civilian Community Corps go? How many people? Is that what the muslim invasion is about? Join with the homies? Did Obama discuss this with the rappers? . . 5 rounds for every American. .

[Art in Idaho]

I've said to people locally, if CWII comes it's not North vs. South, East vs. West, Progressives against Conservatives, it's All of the US against Washington D.C. Really not that big of an AO. 100 million patriots descending on D.C. . .

[Art in Idaho]

I don’t think the TPTB want their cash ATM to be at risk. Hillary would protect that, so the GOPe put up the stooge Jeb who still can’t figure out why nobody liked him.

We'll see how the convention shakes out. . Never worried about any of this crap during the Reagan years.

[Art in Idaho]

This leading to a low intensity civil war will the likely outcome.

Sarah Palin: Palin says voters won't stand for it if GOP 'power brokers' try to take the nomination away from Trump or Cruz. Voters will "rise up" in opposition if Republican power brokers try to take the presidential nomination away from Donald Trump or Ted Cruz at the GOP convention this summer, Sarah Palin said Thursday in a wide-ranging interview.