Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Stat Man

Why wouldn’t it have been of interest to know whom the Coloradans preferred prior to a the CO delegate caucus?

Inquiring minds want to know?


18 posted on 04/12/2016 5:19:27 PM PDT by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
OK, sure, it's slightly interesting. But it has no important meaning, would just be a trivial footnote. Polling is expensive, so apparently no polling institutions thought this trivia was worth their time.

Instead, we found out that the 65,000 or thereabouts caucus goers supported Cruz. That had impact on the delegate count. The opinion of Coloradans who decided not to caucus doesn't matter. It would be like polling the people in 2012 who stayed home and didn't vote for Romney or Obama. Mildly interesting, but 100% unimportant.

19 posted on 04/12/2016 5:42:40 PM PDT by Stat Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies

I’m WAY more bothered by the lack of polling in some states that haven’t voted yet. I try to model what might happen in the delegate count, but several states with primaries upcoming have either no polling data at all, or else very outdated data, in some cases several months old.


20 posted on 04/12/2016 5:45:37 PM PDT by Stat Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson