Posted on 04/03/2016 12:34:18 PM PDT by Sean_Anthony
Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death!
When are Americans, aka, We, the People, going to draw a red line in the sand for the Liar-in-Chief, the Fraud in the Rainbow House, the Lead-From-Behind taqiyyah Muslim and his apologists? How often are we going to sit quietly while he covers up for Muslim terrorists who savagely murder innocent Americans? How many more times must we allow him to imply that we are bigots for seeing Islam for what it is: a political/judicial system known as Shariah that uses “religion” to get submission by its followers, that is spread by barbaric violence and savage threats?
We know full well that he despises conservative, white Americans, calling them bitter people who “cling” to their guns and Bibles. Bibles, by the way, that he never calls “Holy” as he always does the Koran. We also know that he has spent at least $2,000,000 dollars hiding his past - his identity, who he really is - from the American people. A huge part of that past is that he was, and still is, a wannabe Marxist revolutionary, albeit a knee-jerk one. His trip to Cuba, his most recent stop on the Grovel Before Our Enemies Tour, made it clear that in spite of trying to win over communists like Xi, Putin, and the Castro brothers, who actually know what brutal, totalitarian Marxism really is, he has neither impressed nor fooled anyone. The same goes for his groveling before the Iranians, the Saudis, and ISIS.
Great read.
Pray is a bout all I know to do. Done all I can from here in Cincy.
On an aside... Washington Times used to be what the CFP is. I hope they don’t sell out in the future.
Why Islam can NEVER be compatible with Western values:
Islam is FOUNDED on a hierarchy of obligations. There are, at the top, the Noble Islamic Gentlemen (notice immediately the very specificity of gender here). This tier is composed of all males who proclaim their allegiance to Islam, and they have certain rights reserved to them and them alone. Below that level, there are the Dhimmi, a class of non-Muslims who have not chosen to convert to Islam, but show no resistance to having Islamic Law (Shari’ah) imposed upon them. These are people who have allowed the Noble Islamic Gentlemen to impose various restrictions on their liberties and exercise of conscience, in exchange for not being killed outright. Now, it is possible for a female to accept all the doctrines of Islam, but still not be included in that magic circle of Noble Islamic Gentlemen, purely because of gender and gender alone. In that, the females who profess to be Muslim are, in fact, no better off than Dhimmi themselves. In any other civilized society, the females wold be called slaves, wholly subordinated to any Noble Islamic Gentleman to whom they may be bound to by blood relationship or by marriage.
The Noble Islamic Gentlemen are so possessive of these females bound to themselves, that no other man may look upon them, and these female vassals are forced to go about so completely draped with clothing, that only the eyes may be seen by others. At no time may the female make any decision as to whom she may choose to be betrothed (not that there are many dating opportunities ever presented), and often, the bride is contracted out for political or financial advantage, which sounds mighty like a slave auction to us poor benighted Westerners. So, the entire female gender is merely another slave population.
Freedom and Islam are polar opposites, and to declare that Muslims could accept democracy in any form is an oxymoron. Muslims USE the word “freedom”, but it means something completely different from what is the commonly accepted definition of the term. “Freedom”, for Islam, is freedom to impose Shari’ah Law wherever the Noble Islamic Gentlemen choose to settle and set up shop. As a result, all other non-Muslims and ALL females, Muslim or not, must surrender up their freedom.
Oh, and the real sticking point. If any male chooses to not become a Noble Islamic Gentleman himself, and refuses to submit to the slavery that is the state of the Dhimmi, he is Kufir, the infidel or unbeliever, and is subject to immediate execution, perhaps by crucifixion, or by beheading, but a bullet in the base of the skull will do nicely, and is so much quicker in mass numbers.
Females of any persuasion never get a choice. They become sexual objects, unless “lucky” enough for a Noble Islamic Gentleman to select her for one of his multiple wives.
A rather dreadful assimilation.
Oh, yeah, nearly forgot. If a Muslim happens to be the WRONG KIND of Muslim, he is also subject to execution by the “right kind” of Muslim. Depends on who shows up with the most firepower and greater will to win.
"When are Americans, aka, We, the People, going to draw a red line in the sand for the Liar-in-Chief, the Fraud in the Rainbow House, the Lead-From-Behind taqiyyah Muslim and his apologists? ..."
Patriots, please quit picking on Obama !
Note that the RINO-controlled Congress has always had the constitutional authority to impeach and remove lawless Obama from office, but has stubbornly refused to do so.
What’s probably going on is that last-term Obama is allowing Congress to use him as a political pawn.
More specifically, corrupt Congress is letting Obama get away with stealing legislative branch powers in order for Obama to make unconstitutional executive orders.
In other words, corrupt lawmakers are letting Obama effectively make the unconstitutional laws that Congress really wants to make. But by letting Obama do their dirty work for them with executive orders, lawmakers can keep their voting records clean so that they can fool low-information patriots into reelecting them.
Remember in November !
So if patriots elect Trump, Cruz, or whatever conservative they elect, they will also need to elect a new, state sovereignty-respecting Congress that will not only work within its constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers to support the president, but also stop the executive and judicial branches from stealing legislative branch powers.
In fact, note that such a Congress will also probably be willing to fire state sovereignty-ignoring activist justices.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.