Blah, blah, blah! If most doctors were all that interested in that “great responsibility” wouldn't love the service we get from Nurse Practitioners and Physician's Assistants so much.
Any one that answers any ? from a Dr. on firearms is an idiot
It shouldn’t matter to most people - simply LIE to the doctors and tell them you don’t own guns.
Of course you can also tell some version of the truth...something like I own guns, but I keep them safely locked up.
Or you can say it is NONE OF YOUR DAMN BUSINESS.
...anyone care to guess which houses will be searched first?
If you doctor asks, it is like Tom Gresham says: “It is not a sin to lie to someone who isn’t entitled to the truth.”
>>
The three judge panel also found that a physician who categorically tells a patient that it is unsafe to own a gun, without a specific medical reason, is chilling the exercise of the patient’s Second Amendment rights.
<<
According to Barney Frank, “government is just a word for the things we do together.” Thus, Government, as the desired monopoly owner of any guns, must therefore by this logic be supra-human, a being of its own creation. And likewise our wise overlords who give themselves permission to have personal security details of armed men.
An in the above, the Founding Fathers have again shown their incredible wisdom and insight into human nature, and how humans and human governments view power and view the citizens over which they seek to have power.
The Second Amendment is so abhorrent to the left for how it witnesses against their lust for absolute power over the unalienable rights of others and against the Creator who gives every human those rights.
This nonsense began with the radically left wing and anti-gun organization, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), whose political posturing became so offensive that a former AAP president broke off and formed the American College of Pediatricians (ACPeds), that is called “conservative”, even though they are generally apolitical, and believe in traditional medical care and ethics.
There is no end to the leftist antics of the AAP, so parents seeking care for their children need to be warned that they should use only ACPeds pediatricians, lest their children’s (opinionated) medical information be given to the government.
There is no subtlety here. If you are not a leftist, the AAP will abuse your children and you.
This article, this case, demonstrate why the Dem nominee MUST be defeated. Whether Trump, Cruz, Rubio or the man in the Moon is the Republican nominee, he gets my vote. While there is no guarantee that a Republican President’s SC nominee will truly be an originalist and protect the 2nd Amendment, it is a matter of metaphysical certainty that such a Dem nominee will vote to void the protections of the 2nd.
We have a STRONG common interest in uniting against the Dems. Stop the destructive bickering! [This is aimed at no particular person, just the general FReeper community].
So my question is, is the current ruling left standing until the final opinion is released, and does it apply outside the 11th circuit’s boundaries?