Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: w1n1

“After the new ATF rule affecting gun trusts was signed into law on January 4 2016”

Anyone else see the problem?


3 posted on 02/24/2016 5:50:24 AM PST by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lurker

rule != law


4 posted on 02/24/2016 5:54:05 AM PST by ctdonath2 (History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the week or the timid. - Ike)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker

is it the fact that the ATF is making laws?

and if i win, don’t i also lose?

time to turn in our guns. OBAAT!

BLOAT!


5 posted on 02/24/2016 5:56:10 AM PST by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker
Anyone else see the problem?

The "shall not be infringed" problem, or the notice of rulemaking process is not the same as "signed into law" problem?

8 posted on 02/24/2016 6:14:54 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson