Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: TigersEye

Yeah, these are pre 1991 chemical shells. And while the wiki author evidently believes that the shells remained intact because Saddam ordered it, it is more likely due to sloppy Iraqi practices. They didn’t keep good records and didn’t even seem to know where all the dumps were, much less what sort of shells they had in them. If they had kept records it would have made the job of the troops clearing them much safer.


174 posted on 02/16/2016 8:51:44 PM PST by Pelham (Marco Rubio (R-Amnesty). Boy Wonder of the GOP elite.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]


To: Pelham
Report: Hundreds of WMDs Found in Iraq

“The idea that, as my colleagues have repeatedly said in this debate on the other side of the aisle, that there are no weapons of mass destruction, is in fact false.” But don’t expect them to admit it. From FoxNews, with thanks to Arjun:

WASHINGTON “” The United States has found 500 chemical weapons in Iraq since 2003, and more weapons of mass destruction are likely to be uncovered, two Republican lawmakers said Wednesday.

“We have found weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, chemical weapons,” Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Pa., said in a quickly called press conference late Wednesday afternoon.

Reading from a declassified portion of a report by the National Ground Intelligence Center, a Defense Department intelligence unit, Santorum said: “Since 2003, coalition forces have recovered approximately 500 weapons munitions which contain degraded mustard or sarin nerve agent. Despite many efforts to locate and destroy Iraq’s pre-Gulf War chemical munitions, filled and unfilled pre-Gulf War chemical munitions are assessed to still exist.”…

“This says weapons have been discovered, more weapons exist and they state that Iraq was not a WMD-free zone, that there are continuing threats from the materials that are or may still be in Iraq,” said Rep. Pete Hoekstra, R-Mich., chairman of the House Intelligence Committee.

The weapons are thought to be manufactured before 1991 so they would not be proof of an ongoing WMD program in the 1990s. But they do show that Saddam Hussein was lying when he said all weapons had been destroyed, and it shows that years of on-again, off-again weapons inspections did not uncover these munitions….

Santorum pointed out that during Wednesday’s debate, several Senate Democrats said that no weapons of mass destruction had been found in Iraq, a claim, he said, that the declassified document proves is untrue.

“This is an incredibly “” in my mind “” significant finding. The idea that, as my colleagues have repeatedly said in this debate on the other side of the aisle, that there are no weapons of mass destruction, is in fact false,” he said.


175 posted on 02/16/2016 9:00:09 PM PST by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson