Posted on 02/01/2016 5:34:02 AM PST by DrewsDad
66 Stat. Public Law 414 - June 27, 1952. TITLE III - NATIONALITY AND NATURALIZATION. Chapter 1 - Nationality at Birth and by Collective Naturalization. NATIONALS AND CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES AT BIRTH. Sec. 301. (a) The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth; . . . (7) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than ten years, at lest five of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years: Provided, That any periods of honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States by such citizen parent may be included in computing the physical presence requirements of this paragraph.
U.S. Department of State Foreign Affairs Manual Volume 7
Consular Affairs. 7 FAM 1151 INTRODUCTION... b. 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(23); INA 101(a)(23)) defines naturalization as the conferring of nationality of a state upon a person after birth by any means whatsoever. . . For the purposes of this subchapter naturalization includes:... (5) “Automatic†acquisition of U.S. citizenship after birth, a form of naturalization by certain children born abroad to U.S. citizen parents or children adopted abroad by U.S. citizen parents.
See tagline.
Of Trump polls poorly against Clinton (which I highly doubt, btw) Cruz won’t even show on the radar.
America has rejected stuffy, pasty, boring republicans over, and over, and over.
Trump isn’t perfect, but he’s our best shot at turning things around.
[“He did say maybe the wall is not appropriate for the entire border and certain sections are not conducive for that.â€]
What is NOT conducive location to building a wall are mountainous regions of the border, and by natural water boundaries like the Rio Grande. These area can be patrolled by air and water respectively.
Right... But what about him saying he is going to build a gigantic wall with a gigantic door?
Then going down to the border, local government says that is a problem...
Then Trump says... he will build a wall only in certain places..
But in the meantime he still says he is going to build a gigantic wall..
What I see here is a pattern that if he is president will be repeated over and over again... Speak in hyperbole and according to him make unrealistic promises, then later when it comes time to do something, deals will be made and he will just say he was just exaggerating, and what he is doing has the exact same outcome.
I believe it’s time to get away from the professional politicians and go with the new approach...
The GOPe and the democrats look at any election as just continuing the status quo...
In my opinion, Trump is going to create a change...I believe it will be a good change...
Thank you...Day two is going well...
Yes, I remember he said later he would back whatever candidate was nominated...I was just wondering about the others?
I recently retired and now find time to play in here...LOL
You are probably right about those two...I wonder about Paul also...
Lord, we DO live in interesting times...I just pray our grandchildren’s “interesting times” aren’t as scary as ours have become...
Again, thanks...I DO enjoy the exchanges in here...
ROFL...That’s true...(I do spend some time fishing, though)
I didn’t know he was President yet nor a member of CON-gress?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.