[Campion]

Please cite relevant case law proving that there’s such a thing as “naturalized by statute” at birth as distinct from “natural born”. I’m unaware of the law recognizing such a distinction.

[Pikachu_Dad]

There isn’t such a thing. It is just a crazy birther claim.

[Lurkinanloomin]

According to FReeper cboldt, 100% of case law says that.

[John Valentine]

I'm unaware of the law recognizing such a distinction.

You can search forever and come up empty. There isn't one.

Here's the relevant statutory definition of naturalization:

8 US Code 1101 - Definitions

(23) The term "naturalization" means the conferring of nationality of a state upon a person after birth, by any means whatsoever.

notes: 'after birth,' not at birth, and 'by any means whatsoever' including both individual naturalization and collective naturalization - both of which only concern persons already living, i.e. after birth.

[Mollypitcher1]

If there were not a difference, WHY did the Framers specifically use “Natural Born Citizen” for president and vice president, when ALL OTHER references in the constitution are simply CITIZEN?Why bother if there were not a difference?
Read Vattel,Law of Nations and see the wording. Just google it! Both parents Citizens and born on the soil.

[Ray76]

Rogers v Bellei

[jpsb]

The Naturalization Act of 1934