Skip to comments.American Thinker writes an article about me,but doesn't contact me before publishing it. WTF, over?
Posted on 01/16/2016 7:19:08 AM PST by Travis McGee
A fascinating comment on Rick Moran's blog about the Iranian capture of our sailors is making waves in the blogosphere and on Facebook. It makes a lot more sense than any of the official explanations we have received for the capture and subsequent release of the sailors.
Thomas Lipscomb explains:
Flash! A former Navy SEAL, Matt Bracken, just blew up what I have been calling "a pack of lies from the US and Iran" on what the hell happened that got our boats captured and taken to the Farsi Islands.
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/01/calling_bs_on_the_official_story_of_the_iranian_capture_of_two_us_riverine_boats.html#ixzz3xQA8nIM0 Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Gee whiz, this entire AT piece was written about some Facebook and other random jottings I recently posted that were reblogged here, there and eventually everywhere, but nobody thought to actually contact me? Hello?
Is this S.O.P. here? I know I've had a few submissions to AT rejected, but really, how about contacting me about an American Thinker piece that is about what I wrote, to get my take, before posting it?
I'm not out sailing, I'm not off the grid, I'm right here at my computer, and I have to find out about an AT piece about what I wrote, purely by accident?
Seriously? In a way I'm flattered, and in a way I'm insulted."
So American Thinker does a piece on my jottings about the Iranian capture of our Navy boats, jottings that have gone viral to some degree.
But did they contact me first, to get any updated thoughts or comments? My jottings are days old, and there is new information.
I’ve had a few submissions to American Thinker rejected in the past, so I know they have my email address! Plus, I’m on Facebook, plus my email address is on my website.
I don’t know if I should feel complimented, insulted, or both by discovering a piece written about my writing in American Thinker totally by accident.
I’m not off the grid, I’m not out sailing, I’m right here on my computer for the past week.
They should have contacted you. It might have been a sloppy oversight by the editor. Some authors have noted that they never received announcements regarding reviews of their books. Overall, you should be flattered. It showed they considered what you said important.
Just one other question - how is it that an Iranian naval vessel can get within a couple of miles of any US Navy craft in the Gulf without a couple of alert F-18s showing up. Tell me we don’t have alert aircraft in the PG.
(Because it’s about me, and uses my writing, I’m going to post the entire AT piece here.)
A fascinating comment on Rick Moran’s blog about the Iranian capture of our sailors is making waves in the blogosphere and on Facebook. It makes a lot more sense than any of the official explanations we have received for the capture and subsequent release of the sailors.
Thomas Lipscomb explains:
Flash! A former Navy SEAL, Matt Bracken, just blew up what I have been calling “a pack of lies from the US and Iran” on what the hell happened that got our boats captured and taken to the Farsi Islands.
Remember: the single most dangerous area in all the Persian Gulf is a small group of Island in almost the middle of the heavily travelled shipping lanes that is a major naval base for Iran and the HQ of the radical IRG for special operations of their own against all the countries abutting the Gulf. A top Marine told me our two boats were special ops boats with crews that delivered our own SEALS... the direct rivals of the IRG on Farsi.
The idea that toxic area would be a possible rendezvous site area for a refueling is idiotic... as is the idea of commo and navigation failure. You might as reasonably expect Gibraltar to be a rendezvous point for resupply for the Nazi subs in Das Boot.
If the US press today weren’t evenly split between toadys and military incoherents, they should have seen what has been clear to anyone who has any military experience.
Here is Matt Bracken’s stunning take:
I rarely pull out my dusty old trident, but in this case, here goes. I was a Navy SEAL officer in the 1980s, and this kind of operation (transiting small boats in foreign waters) was our bread and butter. Today, these boats both not only had radar, but multiple GPS devices, including chart plotters that place your boat’s icon right on the chart. The claim by Iran that the USN boats “strayed into Iranian waters” is complete bull$âª#âit.
For an open-water transit between nations, the course is studied and planned in advance by the leaders of the Riverine Squadron, with specific attention given to staying wide and clear of any hostile nation’s claimed territorial waters. The boats are given a complete mechanical check before departure, and they have sufficient fuel to accomplish their mission plus extra. If, for some unexplainable and rare circumstance one boat broke down, the other would tow it, that’s why two boats go on these trips and not one! It’s called “self-rescue” and it’s SOP.
This entire situation is in my area of expertise. I can state with complete confidence that both Iran and our own State Department are lying. The boats did not enter Iranian waters. They were overtaken in international waters by Iranian patrol boats that were so superior in both speed and firepower that it became a “hands up!” situation, with automatic cannons in the 40mm to 76mm range pointed at them point-blank. Surrender, hands up, or be blown out of the water. I assume that the Iranians had an English speaker on a loudspeaker to make the demand. This takedown was no accident or coincidence, it was a planned slap across America’s face.
Just watch. The released sailors will be ordered not to say a word about the incident, and the Iranians will have taken every GPS device, chart-plotter etc off the boats, so that we will not be able to prove where our boats were taken.
The “strayed into Iranian waters” story being put out by Iran and our groveling and appeasing State Dept. is utter and complete BS from one end to the other.
Ag the Gates of Vienna, Brian Bodissey passes along an update from Matt Bracken:
I think that the take-down happened in international waters. The Iranians would have known to the minute when the boats were leaving Kuwait, and their probable course to Bahrain, so an intercept would be simple. They know our ROE would be “Do not shoot EVER unless you are fired upon first. PERIOD!!!”
So, if the Iranians jam our boats so they cannot communicate, and then swoop in close, it’s almost a guaranteed outcome. They KNOW we won’t shoot first! So by coming in closer and closer with weapons aimed at our sailors, overwhelming them with numbers at point-blank, then on loudspeaker they say, “Step away from your weapons or we will slaughter you!” At that point, itâs a fait accompli. Once our sailors step back from their guns, it”s over. Next, “Take off your jackets and weapons” etc, until they are in t-shirts only. Then “Kneel down!”
Step by step they get their way, based on a deep understanding of our ROE and our responses at every stage. Once they have control of our boats, they can drive them to Farsi Island, and remove every single GPS device, radar, cell phone etc. Then, there can be no proof of where the attack happened. And worst of all, Obama and Kerry are happy to go along with the lie, in order not to upset the nuclear deal applecart.
Rick Moran points out that one flaw in this scenario is that there was a woman captured, and so far as we know there are no women in Special Forces. He, too, believe that the official story is BS, but that the simple explanation is that the Navy doesn’t want to explain their humiliation and the Obama admininstration wants to keep the Iran deal at all costs.
Hat tips: Clarice Feldman and Cathy Berry Willinger
(Matt Bracken note: Thomas Lifson even “hat tipped” Clarice and Cathy, but he never even contacted me, the guy who wrote the substance of his American Thinker piece!)
Unfortunately this sort of thing seems to be what passes for “journalism” just about everywhere these days.
I had missed your commentary on this event. I had some similar thoughts, great to have it laid out so clearly by someone who has been there, done that. You take appears spot on. We’re being lied to here, just as we were and are being lied to about Benghazi. This Administration appears to lie reflexively.
Re: your observations.
I have been wondering the same thing for days. It doesn’t make sense that that ship was so far off course.
Unless it wasn’t.
That said, and today iran releases the other 4 American hostages?
Something smells fishy. (See what I did there? ;-)
Land based or LPD/LPH deployed?
The only way these particular TWO ships could be “off course” is if they wanted to be “off course”.
Maybe hussein traded this propaganda coup for our other 4 hostages released today?
Far too much of this story reeks of BS from all sides of it. As your original article says, these boats are not without support, mutual if nothing else, nor do they skirt borders. This story simply doesn’t have enough public information to warrant any conclusion other than “not enough information”.
Land to land, Kuwait to Bahrain.
That’s why they had their passports.
Perhaps this was iran applying a spur to Obama’s hide to hand over that 150 bil check.
They would not want to be off course. These were Riverine Squadron boats, not SEALs or SWCCs. These boats are not “special ops” in any way, especially not with only their standard crew of five on each boat. These boats are basically doing a USCG function, since the USCG has mostly departed the region.
My thought also.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.