Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Teacher Union Executives Get Double-Digit Raises While Liabilities Skyrocket
Michigan Capitol Confidential ^ | 12/8/2015 | Tom Gantert

Posted on 12/11/2015 7:24:09 AM PST by MichCapCon

While the teachers they represent have seen very small pay increases or even pay freezes over the past three years, high level executives at the Michigan Education Association union received large raises.

The average increase in the salaries paid to the top four union officials was 18.6 percent over three years. At the same time, the MEA's liabilities increased by nearly $100 million, or 50 percent in one year.

Vice President Nancy Strachan received a 25 percent salary increase between 2012 and 2015 ($119,520 to $149,433). Secretary-Treasurer Rick Trainor was also up 25 percent during the period ($121,476 to $151,675). President Steve Cook’s salary increased 16 percent ($182,154 to $211,390) and Executive Director Gretchen Dziadosz had a 13 percent increase from 2012 to 2015 ($190,196 to $215,222).

The salaries and liabilities are mandated to be reported by the union annually in its federal LM-2 form. The 2015 form recently became available.

Teachers are not getting anywhere near those kinds of raises. For example, a teacher in Plymouth-Canton Community Schools saw her salary increase by 5 percent over a three-year period from $57,448 to $60,346 during 2012 to 2015, according to a Freedom of Information Act.

A Michigan Capitol Confidential survey of the largest Michigan school districts found 13 of the 17 gave some type of pay raise to their teachers in 2014-15. Just one of the 17 districts cut pay, imposing a 1-percent reduction.

The raises come at a time when the MEA’s financial liabilities are skyrocketing, largely due to the cost of retirement benefits granted to its own employees. Union liabilities increased from $206.2 million in 2014 to $304.1 million in 2015.

The salaries the MEA reports to the U.S. Department of Labor vary significantly from year to year. The union says that in some years, there is a delay in the payments it receives from school districts, so some money earned in one year may not be reported until the next.

For example, Trainor’s salary for the four years has been reported as $121,476 (2012), $109,911 (2013), $158,296 (2014), and $151,675 (2015). While the yearly fluctuations can lead to pay cuts and pay raises, the trend has been one of significant increases for the top executives.

Steve Cook's salary has increased since he became president but is still about $24,000 short of what his predecessor made in 2011. Former MEA President Iris Salters made $235,447 in her final full year as president. Cook’s salary as vice president was $206,106 in 2010 and that was cut to $196,594 in 2011. Cook had his salary reduced to $182,154 in 2012 in his first full year as president and then it has increased three consecutive years.

Jim Perialas, president of Roscommon Teachers Association, said the teachers he has talked to around his part of the state are not getting much of a raise, if any at all.

“It’s the same thing I’ve always felt over the last 20 years: They are out of touch,” Perialas said about the MEA executives. “They are extremely out of touch with what is going on with the rank-and-file in the union. Nobody in the rank-and-file will call them out on it. It’s a money grab.” The Roscommon teachers union left the MEA in 2012 and now operates as an independent union.

The MEA didn’t respond to emails about their salary increases.


TOPICS: Education
KEYWORDS: union

1 posted on 12/11/2015 7:24:09 AM PST by MichCapCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

But, but I thought that unions cared about their people?


2 posted on 12/11/2015 7:26:25 AM PST by OttawaFreeper ("You'd see a different game if nobody wore a helmet". NY Rangers' Barry Beck 1983)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OttawaFreeper
But, but I thought that unions cared about their people?

They don't have to. The teachers in my district do NOT elect their national leaders. Therefore, the national leaders have no need to worry about any backlash from the membership over anything.

I am, in fact, surprised that the national leaders don't loot and lie more than they already do.

The national leaders are elected by delegates sent to some convention somewhere. These delegates are elected by the membership. At least in my district, delegate election resembles selection to the old Supreme Soviet. Slate voting only, questionable ballot counting, etc.

3 posted on 12/11/2015 7:36:56 AM PST by Leaning Right (Why am I holding this lantern? I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OttawaFreeper
The teachers in my district do NOT elect their national leaders

To clarify, the state union leaders are not selected directly by the membership either.

4 posted on 12/11/2015 7:39:29 AM PST by Leaning Right (Why am I holding this lantern? I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

Whatever the reasons for their creation, teachers’ unions, like most unions, are run solely for the enrichment of their officers and for the enrichment of politicians.


5 posted on 12/11/2015 8:20:51 AM PST by arthurus (Het is waar. Tutti i liberali sono feccia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson