Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

We don’t need 20 million armed ‘citizen marshals’; Need a government willing to identify them
canada Free Press ^ | 12/07/15 | Robert Laurie

Posted on 12/07/2015 5:16:47 PM PST by Sean_Anthony

Solution? More like recipe for disaster.

Earlier today, you probably saw Dan’s piece in which he proposes that “the solution” is to vet and raise a force of “20 million trained, armed, citizen marshals.” Obviously, it’s easy to understand the impulse behind the suggestion. We’re all eager to find a solution to the terrorism and mass shootings, as well as the daily violence that plagues America’s Democrat-controlled urban centers.

But Dan’s wrong.

This is exactly what we don’t need. It’s as bad an idea now as it was back in 2008 - only then it was Barack Obama trotting it out during campaign stops: (scroll down for video)


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: marshals; obama; terrorism

1 posted on 12/07/2015 5:16:47 PM PST by Sean_Anthony
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

I’ll take my chances with the 20 million, thanks.


2 posted on 12/07/2015 5:21:19 PM PST by ryan71 (Bibles, Beans and Bullets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ryan71

So you’d rather the government decide who gets guns?
(I’m guessing you didn’t read the article.)


3 posted on 12/07/2015 5:29:52 PM PST by plsjr (<>< Mankind "knows" by trial and error; Only the CREATOR really knows His creation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: plsjr
This is a no-brainer.

If we do not have a government willing to identify "them" as the author concedes, then it is absolutely clear 20 million armed citizens qualified and commissioned by their local sheriffs to act in the capacity of marshals are indeed needed.

4 posted on 12/07/2015 5:48:38 PM PST by frog in a pot (What if a previously D liberal candidate promised most of the things we wanted to hear from the R's?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: plsjr

Read the article before commenting? What a novel idea.


5 posted on 12/07/2015 5:51:13 PM PST by BBell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Screw “deputization”.

I does not take a great deal of training to know who the bad guys are when they are trying to shoot you.
CONSTITUTIONAL CARRY and privately-owned guns will do the job nicely. No gummint permission (OR registration) needed nor required.

To nay-sayers: Just remember that the armed and TRAINED p0-lice end up shooting the wrong person ELEVEN PERCENT of the time, when as and IF they are even present.


6 posted on 12/07/2015 7:18:07 PM PST by Flintlock (Our soapbox is gone, the ballot box stolen--we're left with the bullet box now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony
I'm not for limiting the Rights of most of us to 'empower' a few of us. Period.

That is what creating another class of citizen would do, eventually.

We can NEVER assume any power granted to government will be used for 'good'.

History ever reminds us that power will inevitably be turned nefarious and diabolical ends.

7 posted on 12/08/2015 1:45:58 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson