No,the idiot is usually the one commenting the commenter, instead of discussing the subject at hand.
Here you comment about my english (irrelevant) and you comment about Olavo instead of his points.
Bottom line you behave like the typical school dunce who cannot make the essay on the subject the teacher wants to talk about, and instead you say “the teacher is rude, the teacher is stupid”, ie. you avoid the difficult subjects and go into attack mode on people.
Like I said, saying obsenities might be unfortunate, but to be vulgar, ie. to ignore or to not delve into the subject matter is terminally deleterious.
The problem is: You do not understand English and Olavo. Vulgarity, according to Merriam-Webster, is the quality or state of not having good taste, manners, politeness, etc., and something (such as a word) that is offensive or rude.
And when you say “you avoid the difficult subjects and go into attack mode on people” you ignore (yes, there is ignorance in you) that instead of addressing the issue as a real philosopher (yes, Julio Severo has already criticized the World Council of Churches), Olavo went in attack mode on me (Julio Severo is a scoundrel). Your inconsistency is gross.
I will not repeat here the many vulgarities and dirty words of Olavo, because the conservative public in America hates such behavior.
But it is enough to say that he is an avid revisionist of the Inquisition: http://lastdayswatchman.blogspot.com/2015/10/neocons-inquisition-russophobia-and-lies.html