Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: chrisinoc

Why destroy history? I take it this was a ‘value of the land it sat on’ deal?


3 posted on 11/17/2015 7:39:05 PM PST by Norm Lenhart (Existential Cage Theory - Embrace it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Norm Lenhart

“Why destroy history? I take it this was a ‘value of the land it sat on’ deal?”

The building has not been a Taco Bell restaurant for a long time and was closed since 2014. The Downey location is no longer in the greatest of neighborhoods.

In Irvine it won’t be vandalized and will be restored to 1960s condition.


16 posted on 11/17/2015 8:20:25 PM PST by chrisinoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Norm Lenhart

“Why destroy history? I take it this was a ‘value of the land it sat on’ deal?”

Even to continue with Taco Bell, it is time to replace the structure after so long.

SoCal is covered with shopping centers from the 50s, 60s and 70s which are worn out, functionally obsolete, etc.

Give Taco Bell credit, for preserving the iconic building and moving it to the Corporate Hq. site. They have preserved history, not destroyed it.


25 posted on 11/17/2015 9:14:59 PM PST by truth_seeker (come with the outlws.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson