Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Enlightened1
The bigger picture here is that college football players generate a ton of revenue for an NCAA Division I school, and because of this they can effectively run the school if they want to.

Once this group of players threatened to boycott the next game, the president was gone. The University of Missouri -- and the conference they belong to -- would have gotten themselves involved in a huge financial/legal mess with the TV network (CBS, I think) that pays tens of millions of dollars to broadcast their games.

The more interesting angle of this story is that NCAA players all over the country can now see themselves staging a similar type of "strike" for any reason whatsoever -- and getting pretty much any results they want.

17 posted on 11/11/2015 4:23:05 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("It doesn't work for me. I gotta have more cowbell!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child
Correct.

If Pinkel were a man about it, he should have started the second or third string for the game and benched the starters.

If even they were stupid enough to go along with this, he should have contacted the alumni and boosters, explained the situation to them, and forfeited the game.

The alumni would do something then to discipline the team.

19 posted on 11/11/2015 4:41:56 AM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child

college football players generate a ton of revenue for a NCAA Division I school


That is a total of 128 schools. Top 30 teams heading to the bowls are not going to strike. Only about 50 or so actually make money, most are money losers.


25 posted on 11/11/2015 5:28:36 AM PST by outpostinmass2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson