The Legacy of George Soros Part 3

September 11, 2001 was a moment deeply etched into the psyche of the American mind. It brought this country together like at no other time in the past. For Geeoge Soros it had a completely different meaning. To Soros it showed that foreign policy under Clinton, Bush and further even in the Obama presidency was arrogant, leading to an anti-American hatred across the globe.

Soros himself had decided Bush was “evil” for no other reason than that he called our enemies “evil. Bush also expressed exceptionalism in the American way of governing and in the country in general. Where the American people tended to demonize the terrorists, Soros was of the impression that it was economic inequality and exploitation of the poor countries by the elites, of which Soros was one, that lead to the attack on 9/11. These thoughts were also part of Obamas way of thinking, when Marie Harf, the White House spokeswoman at the time, declared that all the terrorists needed were jobs. Soros perceived that America could maintain our position of power by mandating a global “War on Poverty” based on the Great Society programs of Lyndon Johnson of the 1960’s. Soros called upon the “rich countries” to further boost the international assistance given to alleviate international extremism. This also involves, according to Soros “ a growing inequality between rich and poor within countries themselves.

After the invasion of Iraq, which Soros found appalling, he hired Clinton Adminstrations Former official as the Director of the Open Society Institute. Halperin has been suspected by the State Department to be a communist sympathizer, and was the author of the Pentagon Papers, a progressive view of the war in Vietnam. From 1975-1992m Halperin worked as director of another ACLU project, funded by Soros called the Center for National Security Studies whose main goal was to cut US Defense, and to interrupt intelligence capabilities. In the book “Target America” James L. Tyson wrote:

“Halperin and his organizations have a record of advocating the weakening of U.S. Intelligence communities. His writings would be a score of 100% favorable to the Communist line.”

Soros believes that 9/11 should have been treated as a crime against humanity that should be targeted as a police matter and not a military action. Bush was blamed for fomenting an unreasonable fear over terrorism accusing Bush of “fostering fear because it helped to keep the nation lined up behind the president”. Soros as a matter of routine, called Bush and Republicans in general, as being extremists who didn’t believe in freedom and in contradiction to “open society principles”, but were based on the supremacy of the American foreign policy use of force.

Soros was convinced that Bush was dishonorable, used false and exaggerated intelligence to force the American invasion of Iraq on the American people and the world. He accused Bush of pursuing World domination by the invasion of Iraq, and pushing the “American” form of democracy on the Iraqi people. The pro-Israeli lobby came under fire by Soros, claiming it was they who Bush was catering to on the invasion. Soros also accused the rank and file military men and women of arrogance because of the example set by Bush. .Abu Gharib, which was proven to be a singular action, has been used by Soros to accuse the rank and file of torturing prisoners. Soros used his experience of being an integral part of both Nazi and Communist rule to draw a profile of George Bush of the same atrocities, comparing Bush policies to Soviet rhetoric of the “people democracies.”

In September 2003, in an interview with the BBC, Soros declared that it was imperative that regime change come to the United States. There were three main points that Soros said would change the country both politically and ideologically and should be implemented immediately. The Subjugation of American power, as we see occurring now with the destruction of our military by Obama. The subjugation of American sovereignty something we will see with the forced implementation by the UN, and with Obamas blessings of Agenda 2030 in September, and the implementation of income through economic redistributive policies, something Obama has discussed in the past, and will soon be a primary focus of the United Nations. Soros declared “I could do a lot more about the issues I care about by changing the government than by pushing the issues. Soros had spent eight years building a political and ideological base to do his bidding, and his influence first showed in the passage of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, known as McCain Feingold. Soros spent money in both print, and his progressive foundations to assure there were “experts”o would tell Congress and the media that the American people felt campaign finance reform was an issue they cared deeply about.

The Open Society Institute along with eight other foundations that Soros gave money to spent some $140 million dollars on research that was totally fact free. It was contrived through such institutions as the Pew Research Council, and the Pew Charitable Trusts,who knew from the beginning of the study that the purpose of the study was political, and that the project would be stopped if it did not achieve the desired goals. This is the same type of charitable giving that is now being used in climate change by this administration.

Republicans enjoyed a 2 to 1 advantage over Democrats before McCain-Feingold. After McCain Feingold, the only organizations that would not restrictions would by 527’s, named after that protion of the tax code. Special interest groups, such as the Open Society Institute, were 527’s that we not bound by any legal limits. Thses 527’s, which aft5er the passage of McCain Feingold could give unlimited money as long as they were not issue oriented ads to anyone they wished, These 527’s flowed money to the Democratic Party to work towards the election of candidates that would be controlled by the progressives giving the money such as Soros, This has lead to a movement to the left of the Democratic Party.

Soros has developed a shadow party which first took shape on Long Island in 2003. Soros was there to oversee the defeat of President Bush, and had such people as. Mark Halperin, the socialist of the ACLU, Ellen Malcolm, abortion rights activist, John Podesta, Clinton former chief of staff, Carl Pope from the Sierra Club and others. At this time the organization, America Coming Together was founded and given $10 million, along with money from Peter Lewis, the chairman of Progressive Insurance and the CEO of Real Networks, Robert Glaserall committed $1 million each to ACT.

This was the start of Soros shadow government which has expanded to unions, teachers groups and other numbering in the hundreds with thousands of supporters and volunteers.

Why is it always so hard for people to understand human nature?

Which communist leader, after the revolution was successful, turned down leadership of his country to go pull turnips?

Not one.

Here’s what motivates these people.

Power and wealth.

They don’t want to go out in the fields and pick turnips.

Let's see...George Soros, who I have read, initially made his fortune profiting off property stolen from Hungarian Jews as they were rounded up and sent to be killed at Auschwitz, started his extreme anti-American activities because he was offended by what George Bush was doing?!!! Because he thought Bush was destroying America’s freedom??! Sorry, that is ludicrous. The man hates America, he hates the principals that it was founded on, and he is using his vast fortune to subvert our Republic. He should be tried and convicted of treason and be punished with an appropriate penalty...Or better yet he should suffer the fate of the people whose property launched his unholy career!

In light of Soros' bankrolling of the astroturf protests in Ferguson and Baltimore (and the failed effort in Charleston), I find Soros' remarks from over three years ago to be quite telling. From "George Soros on the Coming Class War" (http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2012/01/22/george-soros-on-the-coming-u-s-class-war.html), January 23, 2012:

As anger rises, riots on the streets of American cities are inevitable. “Yes, yes, yes,” he [Soros] says, almost gleefully. The response to the unrest could be more damaging than the violence itself. “It will be an excuse for cracking down and using strong-arm tactics to maintain law and order, which, carried to an extreme, could bring about a repressive political system, a society where individual liberty is much more constrained, which would be a break with the tradition of the United States.”

For Geeoge Soros it had a completely different meaning.

Yes, his friends were winning.

Soros is a Nazi collaborator, convicted of a felony in France. If you're America's enemy, Soros supports you.

People have been denaturalized and deported for less than Soros has done.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.