Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Grampa Dave

Walmart did exactly the opposite.


16 posted on 08/10/2015 7:58:46 AM PDT by OregonRancher (Some days, it's not even worth chewing through the restraints)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: OregonRancher

Wal-Mart’s annual report cites modification (reduction) in SNAP/EBT benefits as an item having a material/negative impact on its business. Their distribution centers and stores are collocated with subsidized housing. Their employees qualify for Medicaid.

http://www.ibtimes.com/first-time-walmart-annual-report-cites-changes-food-stamps-other-public-assistance-plans-risk-factor

If WalMart was a person, it would be categorized as white trash— everybody else picks up the tab for their existence.


20 posted on 08/10/2015 8:36:15 AM PDT by ameribbean expat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: OregonRancher

Some companies do the opposite.

Or some companies/parents make the heirs rich trust fund babies and tell them to go west or south to an ocean and stay away from running the company to remain rich trust fund babies.


25 posted on 08/10/2015 2:10:50 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (Only, the anointed ones in the Beltway/NY City mediot/pundit cliques know what is best for us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson