To: 2ndDivisionVet
The idea of “saving the planet” for the sake of the planet is very strange. The planet doesn’t care if it’s “saved” or not.
And “overpopulation”? Again? Didn’t the Ehrlich/Simon bet settle this once and for all?
8 posted on
07/12/2015 3:53:15 AM PDT by
St_Thomas_Aquinas
( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
To: St_Thomas_Aquinas
And “overpopulation”? Again? Didn’t the Ehrlich/Simon bet settle this once and for all? I thought Malthus had been proven wrong a few hundred years ago. Ehrlich is late to the game if you ask me.
37 posted on
07/12/2015 7:36:16 AM PDT by
KosmicKitty
(Liberals claim to want to hear other views, but then are shocked to discover there are other views)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson