Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary’s lawyer: Oh, THAT subpoena? See, it depends what the meaning of ‘I’ve never’ is
Canada Free Press ^ | 07/09/15 | Dan Calabrese

Posted on 07/09/2015 7:03:05 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony

A classic Clintonian response

I wonder if there has ever been a married couple in the history of mankind that has had to send its lawyers out to clarify their statements more times than the Clintons have. I said what? That’s been immediately exposed as a blatant lie? Fine, I meant something else.

The really interesting stat, if we could ever uncover it, would be how often they’ve pull crap like this in their conversations with each other. You were where? With who? Then again, that assumes that either of them views it as a real marriage and not as an alliance of convenience for the sake of their respective political ambitions. I wouldn’t lay odds there. But back to the matter at hand: When you say you’ve never had a subpoena - “I’ve” of course being a contraction of “I have,” which means at no point right up to the present time - that clearly means never. Not then. Not now. Not ever. That’s what it means, and that’s what the words were clearly meant to convey.

One problem: Trey Gowdy has a copy of the subpoena, and he immediately produced it. Busted? Not in Clintonworld. That just means you send out your laywer to do what lawyers do in Clintonworld:


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: benghazi; clinton; emails

1 posted on 07/09/2015 7:03:05 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Call her what she is....A LIAR!!!!


2 posted on 07/09/2015 7:04:53 AM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Subpoenas are meaningless unless enforced.


3 posted on 07/09/2015 7:06:32 AM PDT by Ray76 (Obama says, "Unlike my mum, Ruth has all the documents needed to prove who Mark's father was.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Vast right wing conspiracy. Depends what the meaning of "is" is. I did not have sex with that woman.

4 posted on 07/09/2015 7:08:00 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Liar, liar, pantsuit on fire!


5 posted on 07/09/2015 7:09:19 AM PDT by Semper Mark (Vlad Tepes was a piker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ray76
Subpoenas are meaningless unless enforced.

Hey, Gowdy, get the message? Maybe is would save us money and time if you just disband the committee. Hillary and her band of criminals got you but good.

6 posted on 07/09/2015 7:27:30 AM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

Boehner is the problem. Republicans made Boehner Speaker... again. Top to bottom, Republicans are the problem. They’re the JV team for the Democrats. If they play ball they rise, perhaps to the Speakership or beyond. The Uniparty must go.


7 posted on 07/09/2015 7:31:02 AM PDT by Ray76 (Obama says, "Unlike my mum, Ruth has all the documents needed to prove who Mark's father was.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

While Gowdy’s task is far more limited than many FReepers believe, it is also true that a man who would put country above personal ambition would call out Boehner for appointing a fake committee and refuse to participate unless real conditions were met.


8 posted on 07/09/2015 7:36:21 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony
Double speak is the only way they talk and the Clintons are masters at it and have passed the technique down to all political Democrats running for office. They must have a school to teach this technique.

You have to listen really carefully, every time they speak, they will say the same thing in another sentence, but in a different form, therefore giving them deniability, and the Media are more than willing to parse the words.

I didn't say that, I said this. Well by golly, says the Media, you did and we can prove it. The Crowley's ObamaRomney debate is a perfect example of Media Prostitution on covering what they said they didn't say when they said what they did say they didn't say.

Oh what difference does it make now, that was so Last nightish, who's gonna remember, ghee can't we just get on with the peoples business?

It is much like listening to a Abbott & Costello skit, except each of the Clintons play both parts when speaking.

9 posted on 07/09/2015 7:55:30 AM PDT by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson