Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Ignores Our Constitution and Wears the Hats of Obama-type Fascists
Canada Free Press ^ | 07/04/15 | Jerry McConnell

Posted on 07/04/2015 10:56:10 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony

Many American citizens have been openly questioning and wondering if the recent SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United States) decisions regarding and Same Sex Marriage are the beginnings of a governmental fascist takeover by self-appointed elitists.

The SCOTUS decisions were much less Constitution-based directives for guidance as the work of that body is properly defined, but more establishment of illegal law as articulated by five or six, self-deigned ‘supreme beings’ in the beginnings of a coup d’état for outright control of our government.

Three of the Justices of the current body who were appointed by conservative U. S. Presidents remained true to their appointments and voted against the health care and new interpretation of marriage and one was vehemently opposed and spoke for the minority.

The fourth Justice, Roberts, deserted his appointing authority on the health care issue but remained loyal to the conservative point of view on the marriage vote. But another Justice also appointed by a conservative President, and one who gets great delight out of being a pivotal figure who reaps much in the way of press publicity, contrary to the goals of conservatism, Kennedy, can not be depended on by either side and votes just to please himself while basking in the public limelight.

(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: constitution; impeachment; supremecourt

1 posted on 07/04/2015 10:56:10 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony


2 posted on 07/04/2015 10:59:45 AM PDT by QT3.14 (How long before 'DIXIE' cups are banned?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

SCOTUS lies about what is written in the Laws passed
by Congress, and often lies multiple times in their
Decisions which re-write the Law and what is written
to preserve their own EXEMPT position before said Laws.

They have thus destroyed any concept of Constitutional
and legal integrity, or possibility that they are Moral.


3 posted on 07/04/2015 11:01:18 AM PDT by Diogenesis ("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

The problem is that we the people have no place to turn in order to get rid of them. The congress is in on the game. There is no checks and balances. There is no difference between parties as we found out this last election. The military has been “cleansed” and is full of people who disregard the Constitution. The courts also disregard the Constitution. We are F#%%^d.


4 posted on 07/04/2015 11:02:15 AM PDT by davidb56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

The supreme Court DOES NOT HAVE APPELLATE JURISDICTION when a State is a “Party to the action”. ALL rulings are VOID and Have NO LEGAL EFFECT. When the supreme Court takes a case in it’s “Original Jurisdiction” when a “STATE” is a party to the action, then and only then do they have a LEGAL RULING, All others are strictly FORBIDDEN by this article. They are mere suggestions and NO STATE is BOUND by any ruling that arises out of an UNCONSTITUTIONAL RULING in an APPELLATE CASE.

Failure of the supreme Court to take the case in it’s Original Jurisdiction makes the ruling Null and Void where a State is concerned.

Article 3, section 2 US Constitution.

In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.


5 posted on 07/04/2015 11:08:18 AM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

The USSC has effectively overturned the US Constitution and that will never be different because of what is now “precedent.” I would say we have to have an Article 5 Convention but that would have to happen in the next 6 months at most. After that the faits accomplis will be numerous and overwhelming. The States will be blocked from proceeding.


6 posted on 07/04/2015 11:12:53 AM PDT by arthurus (It's true!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

The Founding Fathers never had to deal with agenda driven commies.. They didn’t exist per se back then.

That is not their fault. It is OURS!!!


7 posted on 07/04/2015 11:15:55 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (SEMPER FI!! - Monthly Donors Rock!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

The coup happened on Usurpation Day Jan. 20, 2009

When we swore in an ineligible usurper we left the Constitution behind. It was done with the full support of all of our political and judicial officials.

Forfeit Art. II Sec. 1

Forfeit all

The Republic ended that day.

As long as everyone keeps pretending, all will be well/s


8 posted on 07/04/2015 11:16:49 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony
"On every occasion [of Constitutional interpretation] let us carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying [to force] what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, [instead let us] conform to the probable one in which it was passed." - Thomas Jefferson, letter to William Johnson, 12 June 1823
9 posted on 07/04/2015 11:17:32 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not A Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony
I am so disappointed in Republican appointments to the court like Roberts and Kennedy. What were they thinking. I certainly will never fall for that old line” Well we have to hold our nose and vote for some mushy liberal Republican”. I will just laugh.
10 posted on 07/04/2015 11:26:28 AM PDT by WENDLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davidb56

We have to turn to ourselves.

Washington has broken the contract.


11 posted on 07/04/2015 12:01:24 PM PDT by SuzyQue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

If they held to the 10th and 11th Amendment, we wouldn’t have gay marriage now. For that matter, if the held to those 2 Amendments, we wouldn’t have Roe vs Wade.

Supreme Court Justices should go back and read the Constitution and the Bill of Rights before proceeding.


12 posted on 07/04/2015 12:23:28 PM PDT by maxwellsmart_agent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davidb56; All

The marriage issue is dealt with very simply. The institutional church has for too long subsumed itself under the authority of the state regarding marriage. In fact and tradition Holy Matrimony is a sacred rite having no relationship to state licensure. The church must now abandon its requirement that a couple seeking matrimony must have a state license. If the church does not do this they will be required to honor all licenses issued by the state.
Marriage in the church is no different than baptism or communion. Each are a rite established by God to bring the celebrant into union with Christ. The state has no dominion over this explicitly religious ritual.
A vast majority of young people are living together today without state certification. Many of them cherish each other and would joyfully celebrate their love and commitment for each other in a religious celebration.
Marriage is ordained by God, not the state. Let SCOTUS be
SCOTUS and God be God. Marriage between a man and a woman is of God. Licensure between any 2 or more consenting adults of any age is of the state. Let the two forever be torn asunder.


13 posted on 07/04/2015 1:20:37 PM PDT by Louis Foxwell (This is a wake up call. Join the Sultan Knish ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

So far it looks like the SCOTUS nothing but moles except a few.


14 posted on 07/04/2015 1:23:09 PM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson