Posted on 05/10/2015 8:49:31 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
The radical pro-homosexual activist leader of the United Kingdom’s Green Party announced that she is “open” to legalizing “marriages” between three or more people on the island nation.
A staunch supporter of LGBT rights, Australian-born Natalie Bennett made her position on the issue of polygamist marriage loud and clear when answering a question asked by the pro-homosexual Pink News.
"As someone living with his two boyfriends in a stable long-term relationship, I would like to know what your stance is on polyamory rights,” a Pink News reader inquired of Bennett. “Is there room for Green support on group civil partnerships or marriages?"
Why not?
Even though Bennett’s Green Party does not have an official stance on the issue, she insists that she and her earth-friendly adherents would be more than open-eared when discussing the legalization of polygamy in the U.K.
"At present, we do not have a policy on civil partnerships involving more than two people," Bennett responded. “[However, we are] open to further conversation and consultation [about polygamy].”
In the same breath, Bennett boasted about her party’s record of voting for sexual libertinism and its proclivity for pushing through policies and laws that are an affront to families and those ascribing to biblical values.
"We are, uniquely in this country, a party whose policies are developed and voted for by our members,” Bennett continued. “We have led the way on many issues related to the liberalization of legal status in adult consenting relationships, and we are open to further conversation and consultation."(continued)
(Excerpt) Read more at onenewsnow.com ...
Only a matter of time once the degeneracy of “gay” marriage was imposed. Pedophiles are next up for “legitimacy.”
Polygamy causes climate change.
Libertarians, liberals, with gay marriage, the left’s/libertarians concept of “consenting adults” takes over.
Can you marry a tree yet?
I’ve got my eyes on this Birch up the block
just waiting for incest...that’s what they want the world to be one big rolling humpathon
Not necessarily Libertarian.
There is a big difference between saying no government and
no morality.
The Greens are actually hard core Statist, about as far from a Libertarian as you can get.
Libertarianism fully supports “consenting adults”, that means gay marriage, polygamy, whatever.
Zero restrictions of gay, polygamous, or whatever, and people who support social liberalism are not moral.
once the UK ruling elite let in millions of people from IslamoNazi countries, with their quite different “morals” — well, ‘anything goes’ is just about the only way of dealing with the mess they’ve made
unless, of course, the Brits discover the courage that we Americans still lack..... and send the Moslems back to their own countries
This is FAR too ignoble a way for Great Britain to die.
FAR too ignoble, indeed.
Not at all surprised. Despite all the pooh-poohing to the contrary by gay activists and media types, polygamy was always going to be the next issue on the table once gay marriage became legal.
Playing Devil’s Advocate for a moment, if we can redefine the core marriage principle of one man, one woman to two men or two women, then why not a man and two women or a woman and two men? Love is love, right? And, quite frankly, there’s a lot more historical basis in human history for multiple wives than there ever has been for gay marriage.
I also think polygamy will be just fine with the gay activist class because it goes along with the objective of destroying what they call “heteronormative” standards.
As an aside, and looking towards the future...I sometimes wonder how long it will before one is considered a bigot if they don’t wish to date a transsexual claiming to be of the opposite gender? I’m not kidding here. I can foresee the day coming when it becomes socially unacceptable to turn down a date because of someone’s biological gender.
We are living in very strange times, folks.
Everything you say seems true, and very predictable as a logical development of current trends and the logic of the gay marriage movement.
No, but species is a construct. So you can declare what species you belong to. The government will pay for your surgeries to be ‘barked’
And, of course, since Christian morality tends to abhor their true goals and “values”, they conveniently launch efforts to take over Christian sects one by one and said sympathetic “clergy” bends to the “new morality” giving it that false veneer of Christianity.
Of course, the Bolsheviks merely stamped out Christianity, the Nazis were also on course to doing so (as it was simply utter at odds with their agenda), the “American Progressive” will merely use/manipulate the church for their own agenda until such time as they, too, will stamp it out as no longer necessary.
As you said, they’re basically all the same. Curiously, if the Nazis had been allowed to spread unchecked, the one “religion” (and I’m loathe to call it as such) that would’ve been able to survive and flourish was Mohammadanism, as it wasn’t really much at odds with the Nazi agenda (even if the bulk of its adherents didn’t entirely match up to the Aryan racial superiority, but Hitler wasn’t much bothered by that in the early going). They could barely stave off the stampede of their wanting to become Nazis in the Middle East, the almost perfect party to house their totalitarian agenda. Gee whiz, look at Persia, which renamed itself Iran (for Aryan) in the midst of that madness in 1935.
EC730 A Citizen's Income sufficient to cover an individual's basic needs will be introduced, which will replace tax-free allowances and most social security benefits (see EC711). A Citizen's Income is an unconditional, non-withdrawable income payable to each individual as a right of citizenship. It will not be subject to means testing and there will be no requirement to be either working or actively seeking work.
They were already fine with a girl marrying her biological father in New Jersey, so you’re a little late on that prediction.
I want this to progress to marrying my dog, before she dies.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.