Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The War on Poverty – $40 Trillion Funding Failure Rather than Facebook or FUBU or Ford
Flopping Aces ^ | 05-05-15 | Vince

Posted on 05/05/2015 3:17:52 PM PDT by Starman417

Last year the United States celebrated the 50th anniversary of the War on Poverty begun by LBJ in 1964. Over that time the country has spent approximately $40 trillion on welfare and redistribution programs of one sort or another – and that number doesn’t include expenditures for Social Security or Medicare. The program started out slow, but has steadily picked up steam so that today the United States spends over a trillion dollars on welfare programs every year. To put that $1 trillion in perspective, that is more than the GDP of every country on the planet except for the 15 largest. It’s bigger than the GDP of Sweden, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, Turkey, the Netherlands and around 175 others.

That’s a lot of money, but it must be worth it as the War on Poverty must have been a success… right? Not so much. Today poverty in the United States stands at approximately 15% of the population. Fifteen percent sounds relatively low, except when compared to the 18% rate it was $40 trillion dollars ago. After $40 trillion dollars and 50 years, the War on Poverty has reduced poverty by a staggering 3 percentage points!  What's worse, the War on Poverty actually stopped the progress that was already occurring:  During the 15 years prior to the beginning of the War on Poverty, the poverty rate in the United States had dropped from 30% to 15%!

Indeed, the single biggest accomplishment of the War on Poverty seems to have been the proliferation of single parent households… i.e. children born out of wedlock. In 1964 the percentage of American children born to unwed mothers was approximately 4%... so out of every 20 babies born, only 1 was born to an unwed mother. Today 8 out of every 20 babies born in the United States is born to an unwed mother. And according to studies by HHS and others, that’s largely because the welfare state has made such as choice feasible: Holding constant a wide range of variables, including income, education, and urban vs. suburban setting, the study found that a 50 percent increase in the value of AFDC and foodstamp payments led to a 43 percent increase in the number of out-of-wedlock births.

And the proliferation of unwed motherhood has resulted in a dramatic increase in crime, violent crime in particular. According to the Atlantic Magazine: “The relationship [between single-parent families and crime] is so strong that controlling for family configuration erases the relationship between race and crime and between low income and crime. This conclusion shows up time and again in the literature.” In 1965 there were 20 violent crimes for every 1000 Americans. By 2013 that number was 37. That doubling might not sound bad, until you realize that the incarceration rate in the US tripled over that same period, which means that as a percentage of the population there are three times as many Americans incarcerated today as there were when the War on Poverty began, but with many more criminals locked up the violent crime rate has still doubled.

So almost $1 trillion a year of welfare spending for half a century has basically made a small decrease in the poverty rate, pushed unwed motherhood through the stratosphere and dramatically increased the violent crime rate and prison population in the country. That sounds like a typical government success story.

(Excerpt) Read more at floppingaces.net...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: blogpimp; poverty

1 posted on 05/05/2015 3:17:52 PM PDT by Starman417
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Starman417

This was and is not a failure. It is working exactly as planned and has bought a massive number of permanent democrat voters.


2 posted on 05/05/2015 3:21:17 PM PDT by umgud (No such thing as a moderate muslim.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417
The success of the WOP is not judged by how many people are now housed, clothed, and fed. The success would be judged on how many people are capable of making it without huge gov. handouts.

If people are just subsisting, are they really living? By that standard, the WOP has been an unmitigated disaster.

3 posted on 05/05/2015 3:24:37 PM PDT by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: umgud

Hope lBJ suffered when he died. pos

BUT, we did have repub pres and congress in early 2000’s and should have balanced budget at ALL costs to popularity. Heck, we lost them back anyway.

I lied to myself that it was ok to boost the debt ceiling because W said it was “the courageous thing to do” or some such nonsense.

You can BET CRUZ will not do that.


4 posted on 05/05/2015 3:26:04 PM PDT by dp0622
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: umgud
"permanent Dem voters"

You got that right.

5 posted on 05/05/2015 3:31:24 PM PDT by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

I bet he does


6 posted on 05/05/2015 3:32:55 PM PDT by al baby (Hi Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

Past time to evaluate the return on “investment”.


7 posted on 05/05/2015 3:49:18 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: umgud
And we're told to just keep voting.
8 posted on 05/05/2015 4:05:24 PM PDT by Jacquerie (To shun Article V is to embrace tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson