Posted on 04/26/2015 9:40:11 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony
We are witnessing a homosexual juggernaut that will settle for nothing less than their own interpretation of the relations between the sexes
In 1973, the Supreme Court looked into the Constitution, found that it approved of abortion and overruled laws banning it. Other laws have since addressed late term abortions and those resulting from rape or incest, but killing human life in the womb has been lawful since then. . According to the Guttmacher Institute from 1973 through 2011, nearly 53 million legal abortions occurred in the U.S.
By dismantling the fundamental traditions and beliefs of a nation piece by piece, you ultimate will destroy it. Claiming this is done in the name of “love” or “equality” ignores the greater societal issues involved in marriage; the creation of families with mothers and fathers, and, indeed, the welfare of children raised in same-sex marriages.
Abortion remains a moral issue in the minds and hearts of many Americans and now they are waiting to see how the Supreme Court will rule on same-sex marriage. As Ryan T. Anderson wrote in The Heritage Foundation’s publication, The Daily Signal, “There simply is nothing in the U.S. Constitution that requires all 50 states to redefine marriage.”
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
This just may be push God’s button.
Blog Pimp.
Isn’t it nice to have a politburo to decide these things?
It’s a tax! < /John Roberts >
If the right of two sodomites to be sanctioned as married is in the constitution then everything is in the constitution and its totally meaningless to its purpose.
Ruth Buzzi Ginsburg will wake up long enough to write an opinion on how she found gay marriage emanating from her penumbra.
Kagan, Sotomayor, Kennedy and Breyer will lift their robes, look down and agree with ol’ Buzzi.
The circus came to town and never left.
Satan has had it in for that piece of paper for some time now.
The only question that matters is as follows: Have the homosexuals on the Supreme Court been required to recuse themselves?
I will be repeating this on every thread on this topic. it needs to be asked until answered.
No, they have not. No, they will not.
The American judicial system is filled with low level, undereducated jurists and lawyers who think freedom has no limits. Our fore-fathers, schooled under natural law theories, knew that with every freedom were concommitant duties and that freedom was needed to choose among various goods not between good and bad or good and evil.
Only Clarence Thomas and maybe Scalia understand that.
Eloquent.
It’ll never happen cuz Souter will vote to maintain states rights and Robberts would NEVER betray his core conservative values. Right?
RIGHT? Hehe
< sigh > ok enough sarcasm, I’m just going to accept it now. What more can be done? How else can we stop this modern day Roe v Wade? I don’t see a way.
If they do vote the right way it’ll surely be proof of God.
Separated at birth!
Unfortunately, the only way to save marriage would be to do away with every legal and governmental recognition of it. Nof in tax law, not in estate law, nothing.
As soon as the heterosexuals do the same, I suppose.
The court will impose homosexual marriage nationwide.
It will be declared a civil right to marry a same sex partner.
The media will celebrate another gay marriage week, just as they celebrated for an entire week after Obama came out for homosexual marriage.
But what happens after that? Will we then be on the slippery slope to legalized polygamy and God knows what else??
Will churches be sued over their theology not allowing for homosexual marriage?
Will all in the adoption business be forced out of business if they don’t provide for homosexual people adopting children??
Will this expected ruling make the homosexual community happy; will their lives be complete, now that they can marry a same sex partner??? Or will the expected ruling simply move the goal posts, as the homosexual community finds something else to bitch about??? Will it move the goal posts to now pushing polygamy and group marriage?
Ginsberg has some cold, dead eyes. Creepy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.