Posted on 04/14/2015 12:02:52 PM PDT by Nachum
Bret Stephens reports that Barack Hussein Obama learned how to lie from the Clintons, and that if Hillary Clinton is - God Forbid - elected President, she will continue the lying tradition.Sometime in the 1990s I began to understand the Clinton way of lying, and why it was so successful. To you and me, the Clinton lies were statements demonstrably at variance with the truth, and therefore wrong and shameful. But to the initiated they were an invitation to an intoxicating secret knowledge.Sounds like George Orwell's Big Brother to me....What was this knowledge? That the lying was for the greater good, usually to fend off some form of Republican malevolence. What was so intoxicating? That the initiated were smart enough to see through it all. Why be scandalized when they could be amused? Why moralize when they could collude?
It always works.
...
Consider this columns favorite subject: the Iran deal. An honest president might sell the current deal roughly as follows.
My fellow Americans, the deal we have negotiated will not, I am afraid, prevent Iran from getting a bomb, should its leaders decide to build one. And eventually they will. Fatwa or no fatwa, everything we know about their nuclear program tells us it is geared toward building a bomb. And frankly, if you lived in a neighborhood like theirs70 million Shiites surrounded by hundreds of millions of Sunnisyoud want a bomb, too.
Yes, we could, in theory, stop Iran from getting the bomb. Sanctions wont do it. Extreme privation didnt stop Maoist China or Bhuttos Pakistan or Kims North Korea from building a bomb. It wont stop Iran, either.
Airstrikes? They would set Iran back by a few years. But even in a best-case scenario, the Iranians would be back at it before long, and theyd keep trying until they got a bomb or we got regime change.
Fellow Americans, how many of you want to raise your hands for more Mideast regime change?
So heres the deal with my deal: It never was about cutting off Irans pathways to a bomb. Lets just say that was an aspiration. Its about managing, and maybe slowing, the process by which they get one.
I know thats not what you thought Ive been saying these past few yearsall that stuff about all options being on the table and me not bluffing and no deal being better than a bad deal. I said this for political expedience, or as a way of palliating restive Saudis and Israelis. You feed the dogs their bone.
But if youd been listening attentively, you would have heard the qualifier on my watch added to my promises that Iran would not get the bomb. And what happens after I leave office?
Hopefully, the Supreme Leader will be replaced by a new leader cut from better cloth.
Hopefully, too, this marathon diplomacy will open new patterns of U.S.-Iranian cooperation. But if neither thing happens wed be no worse off than we are today.
Thats why getting a deal, any deal, is more important than the deals particulars when it comes to sanctions relief, inspections protocols and so on. The details only matter insofar as they make the political medicine go down. What counts is that were sitting at the table together, speaking.
...
Question for Mrs. Clinton: Does she think the U.S. should gently midwife Irans nuclear birth or violently abort it? If she wants to be president, our former top diplomat could honor us with a detailed answer.
In the meantime, lets simply note what the liberal way of lying has achieved. We are on the cusp of reaching the most consequential foreign-policy decision of our generation. We have a deal whose basic terms neither side can agree on. We have a president whose goals arent what he said they were, and whose motives he has kept veiled from the public.
Maybe the ayatollah will give him his deal, and those with the secret knowledge will cheer. As for the rest of us: Havent we learned that were too stupid to know whats for our own good?
No he didn't. He learned Taqiyah form the Koran, while at the Madrassa.
NOBLE LIES, NOBLE WARMING. That’s how the left exists.
Oh, they are fully justified in their minds when they lie, break the law, even when they kill people or get them killed,
because their “cause is so noble”.
The article makes the excellent point that Clinton’s transparent lies were uttered to thwart Republicans, so the left gave them an amused pass.
Obama’s lies tend to promote the interests of sworn enemies to the USA, a not-so-subtle difference. It’s no accident when all these countries we “help” suddenly start being run my Muslim Brotherhood.
Please God do not allow anymore of these swine to ruin our beloved land. And PLEASE keep us safe until this social experiment is out of office.
Opening your mouth and having words come out?
Same with ragheads. Lying to “infidels” is highly moral in
Iz-slime; but NOBLE is not in the raghead lexicon! IMHO.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.