Posted on 04/13/2015 10:39:48 AM PDT by MichCapCon
The average household in Michigan will pay as much as $525 more in taxes in 2016 if Proposal 1 is approved by voters on May 5, according to a study by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy.
The study estimated that increasing the sales tax from 6 percent to 7 percent would cost a typical Michigan household $389 and the change in the fuel tax would cost between $88 and $136.
“Policymakers chose to fix the roads with a tax hike instead of budget cuts,” said James Hohman, the author of the study and the assistant director of fiscal policy at the Mackinac Center. “But asking for more taxes pushes budget cuts onto households that will have about $500 less if Proposal 1 is approved. Taxpayers will get something in return for higher taxes — roads will eventually be fixed, though that is only one of the spending priorities in the proposal.”
Proposal 1 is complex. It would make four changes to the Michigan Constitution and is linked to eight legislative bills that also would take effect if voters say “yes” to the constitutional changes. It would raise $2 billion, of which $1.3 billion would go to funding public roads. Another $300 million would go to public schools and $100 million would go to local government revenue sharing.
The proposal will raise the state sales tax from 6 percent to 7 percent as well as create a new and higher wholesale tax on fuel.
Gilda Jacobs, CEO of the Michigan League for Public Policy, said Proposal 1 will put more money in the pockets of low-income residents.
A single parent with two children working full time at minimum wage with an annual income of $16,626 would end up with an extra $608 a year if Proposal 1 passes, thanks to the Earned Income Tax Credit, according to the Michigan League for Public Policy.
A married couple with two children with an income of $24,939 would get an extra $465 a year and a married couple with two children with an annual income of $33,252 would take home an extra $177.
Jacobs said if Proposal 1 passes it will also fund additional public transportation. She said many low income people don’t have cars and that will allow for more buses and bus routes to help get people to work.
“There are good things in there for low-income people,” Jacobs said.
Ed Tomaszewski, who owns a business in Romeo, said it would be easier to support Proposal 1 if all the money were going to roads. He said he’s also skeptical because the state has been diverting previous tax dollars earmarked for roads to pay for things other than transportation.
“I think it is just a shell game,” Tomaszewski said. “I can’t support it.”
Leon Drolet, chair of the Michigan Taxpayers Alliance, said voters will ask a simple question: “Is my life going to get $500 better as a result of this?”
“Most people I’ve talked to don’t have faith that this will make the roads better,” Drolet said. “You are going to pay $500 and maybe get $300 for better roads or $200 for better roads because the rest of the money is being diverted. That’s a tough sell.”
This sucks...more yankees will be heading my way!
This is some f***ing b******t!!
No way will this thing passes, nor SHOULD IT!
We have some of the most shoddy workmanship being preformed on our roads. They “fix” them one year, and then in 2 they are cracked and need to be patched! And now they want more? For what?! Here in Grand Rapids, the leftists got through a tax hike to “fix” the roads, and lots of that is being used for crap like bike lanes and planted medians.
These people are just all too stupid for words. The unmitigated nerve to even conceive of this ballot question is breathtaking.
“...Proposal 1 is complex...”
I will vote any ‘complex’ proposal DOWN. Our ‘lawmakers’ do this to confuse the average voter and publicize the good while they slip in LOTS of crap to these things.
I’m SO tired of this nonsense and games.
This is just wealth redistribution. If they advertised it as such it would be better than lying by saying it is for road improvement. Given the IQ of the people who vote for dimwits, I figure they believe they’ll get away with it and rightly so!
and lots of that is being used for crap like bike lanes and planted medians....Same here. I saw bike paths/hiking trails put in here instead of fixing roads and they wanted to put in more. Since I’m retired, I took a cooler down on the bike/ hiking trail and recorded exactly three people using it in a week, three shifts, 8 hours a day. Most knew me so I asked “Do you use this thing often?” One said ‘Wanted to see how our money was spent.’ Another said it’s easier to get the Dollar Store and another said “ What F’ng business is it of yours?” What a waste.
But . . but . . we have to pass it to see what's in it.
...but think of the children! I want to throw something at the TV whenever I see one of those pro-tax increase commercials.
If you believe that then I have a lovely bridge to sell you.
and this is being shoved thought in a “special election” on may 5th....
the only law i would ever pass would be one that states any and all elections will be held on the second tuesday of november along with the national elections..
a hell of a lot less tax increases, commies being elected to school boards, etc...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.