Posted on 04/10/2015 8:40:05 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony
What are we to believe? The evidence of our eyes and ears or the tall tale from the Rose Garden?
When the president says that Iran wont get nuclear armaments on his watch, hes right if the ayatollahs stick by his version of the so-far unestablished rules of the Lausanne negotiations. With all the disagreement as to whats in the unwritten agreement, Obamas claim may or may not have teeth. Either way, by his own admittance Iran will eventually obtain nuclear weapons (some in his hire say it already has the capacity), just not while hes in office.
According to President Obama, his administration has run a tight ship for the last six years and he denies anything detrimental has happened to the country while hes been standing sentry. Thats his preferred legacy.
The economy, when he acknowledged it was deplorable, was all due to George W. Bushs lax job guarding the perimeters, allowing bank bandits and corporate raiders to infiltrate and make off with billions of dollars. The housing market, still in a basic slump, has been idle because of Bushs permitting toxic mortgage-backed securities to disenfranchise Americans. Foreign policy is still wallowing from Bushs ill-conceived invasion of Iraq, the bad press of an open Guantanamo Bay detention center and the Abu Ghraib scandal that Obama has said encouraged the rise of terrorism and, ultimately, ISIS.
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
All he wants is to do is kick the can down the road to force someone else to deal with it.
The ‘unwritten agreement’ can say or mean anything that either side wants it to say or mean. This is the ‘compromise’ that Kerry ‘negotiated’ as Obama wouldn’t let him come home until he announced an ‘agreement’. None if it means anything. Obama is chastising the Dem Senators, bullying them into supporting this non-existent ‘agreement’, when no one knows what Obama OR Iran is ‘agreeing’ upon. More smoke and mirrors that will sink this country even further into the morass that is the world of Obama/Iran.
What most people don’t understand is that you can have nuclear power without the need for centrifuges.
The only thing a nuclear centrifuge is used for is to make the stuff you need to build a bomb. That’s it.
Iran has them. They shouldn’t. We need to go in and take them away if they won’t give them up, or put sanctions on them that are so damaging that they want to get rid of them.
Nobody even talks about the centrifuges.
How off the wall is this assertion??
Not on my watch...
one second later is just fine though.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.