[oldbrowser]

"We conclude that neither the agents nor the state of Mississippi has demonstrated the concrete and particularized injury required to give them standing to maintain this suit," the decision stated.

I just wonder if the same judges are going to find the same when a Republican president takes over and reverses Obama's executive order?

[i_robot73]

Can ANYONE tell me how, of the FEW Constitutional ‘jobs’ the Fed is delegated to accomplish (immigration and defending the borders) AND that the Executive branch is to FAITHFULLY EXECUTE existing Law (which it does not, and, in fact, creates Law out of whole cloth), does not show injury...let alone ‘standing’ (the black robed tyrants fall-back position)??

And the GOP/RNC response?? *crickets*