Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Roman_War_Criminal

Their “oath” is only to not follow unconstitutional orders.

Not much of a help. If they really wanted to protect against “domestic enemies” to the constitution, we’d actually see some action, but since they’re probably friends w/other law enforcement members, this is never going to happen.


12 posted on 03/26/2015 5:59:25 AM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: fruser1; Roman_War_Criminal

“Oathkeepers” attack profile at public meetings, and their disgraceful conduct at the Bundy Ranch standoff last year has soured me on ever listening to their sales pitch again.


19 posted on 03/26/2015 6:16:51 AM PDT by Old Sarge (Its the Sixties all over again, but with crappy music...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

I agree. Their damn paycheck is way more important than a few infringements and abuse of local American Citizens.

Since I’m noticing more and more illegal aliens in my own neck of the woods, I’m going to assume their damn “OATH” doesn’t include actually following the law either.


37 posted on 03/26/2015 7:58:15 AM PDT by Roman_War_Criminal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson