“Coach is Right” Friday Short Stories

Coach is Right ^ | 3/20/15 | John C. Velisek USN (Ret.)

[Oldpuppymax]

1.) LET’S ALL COVER FOR HILLARY…AGAIN

Upon leaving their positions at the State Department, all former employees must sign an OF-109 form, certifying that they have “surrendered to responsible officials” all classified, unclassified and other work-related documents in their possession. When State Dept spokeswoman Jen Psaki told AP reporter Matt Lee last week that the Department was “unable” to find the form Hillary Clinton was supposed to have signed, Lee responded that “…a human resources department presumably has a file on every employee.” “It can’t be that difficult to–”

“I don’t think former secretaries are standard employees,” interrupted Psaki, joining one of the longest lists in Washington, DC, that being the directory of willing schmoes who have provided cover for a Clinton.

My opinion: Is she serious? The Secretary of State is not a standard employee? Does this go for all Cabinet members, or just Hillary? Schmoe Psaki and those directing her actions clearly believe this will all blow over. They really do think people are that stupid and with low information voters more interested in American Idol than in their liberty, it may be true.

UPDATE: On Wednesday the 18th, the State Department said Hillary never signed an OF-109 form. In fact, had she done so it would have amounted to a felony, given the outright lies she has attested to concerning her emails. The Department now claims the form is only for lower-level employees. Additional updates will be forthcoming upon Hillary telling the State Department what to say next.

Sources: http://cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/psaki-former-secretaries-state-are-not-standard-employees

http://libertyunyielding.com/2015/03/17/breaking-state-dept-has-no-record-of-a-form-of-109-signed-by-hillary-clinton-video/

2.) CHRISTIANS ARE THE REAL TERRORISTS, OUR GOVERNMENT SAID SO

Christians were actually branded terrorists at a 2013 U.S. Army Reserve Equal Opportunity training session in which the instructor presented a...

[cuban leaf]

In before someone bit**es about blog pimping.

Personally, I like these CIR threads...

[WildHighlander57]

I also like CIR.

[WildHighlander57]

Re: item 1 in the story; what is the penalty for not filling out the form?

[ConservingFreedom]

In before someone bit**es about blog pimping.

Personally, I like these CIR threads...

What's good about blog pimping?

Would you enjoy these threads less if the original post were not needlessly excerpted?

[cuban leaf]

I see the excerpt as a nice way to see if I want to bother going to the site.

The exception is if it is a teaser to go to a blog that has a youtube video. I’d rather just go directly to youtube, though I confess I like to see the analysis and comments on the blog sometimes.

[ConservingFreedom]

This is FR policy on excerpting:

“I have no complaint if a good conservative blogger posts his own material to FR, not as an excerpt to drive hits and discussion back to his blog, but rather to impart useful information to OUR readers and to promote and join in on the discussion and conservative activism HERE on FR.

If a blogger can’t or refuses do that, and if he constantly complains or fights with our participants over it, then I’d just as soon he doesn’t post here. It’s not my job to make his content or his presentation or cooperation acceptable to our readers. That’s his job. And if he cannot do it or refuses to do it and continues posting brief excerpts only and obviously attempting to draw away our participants while loudly complaining about it, then I have no sympathy for his complaints and the more apt I am to ban his account and blog.”

- Jim Robinson, http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2636843/posts?page=552#552

(Granted, Oldpuppymax has managed to not complain or fight ... by never participating in any FR conversations but only ever posting excerpts. Adhering to certain letters while p*ssing on the spirit.)