Most gun laws (1934, 1968?, etc.) make no sense. Those laws were enacted by emotional thinkers.
The left loves to use buzz words like “cop-killer”, “automatic” “armor piercing”, “assault rifle” and others, in order instill panic in the low information crowd, hoping they will gain new recruits to their gun-control agenda.
That must be some .223 handgun.
Much of government agencies’ political decisions are based on subjective and irrelevant information. They agenda oriented. Nothing new here.
Were those projectiles created and intended for handgun use? I’m going to wager no, thus are part of the exception of that definition.
Having said that, it would not surprise me that some drone declared them banned. And it shouldn’t take that much effort to get such a ban overturned by a court, since the law is very specific that the round must be intended for use in (not just usable in) a handgun.
The author doesn’t get it at all.
The letter of the law no longer matters.
Those pictures explain why the M855 sucked so bad at 600 yards in the EIC match at the Wilson match. Total inconsistent quality control.
Here I thought Armour was
found on a TANK .