Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why everyone should care about this exploding train
refiinary 29 ^ | February 17, 2015 | laura barcella

Posted on 02/18/2015 5:09:45 AM PST by ABN 505

Yesterday, a train derailed in West Virginia — and exploded. It was carrying more than 100 tons of crude oil, and it burst into flames after going off the rails outside of Charleston. Miraculously, no one was killed, though hundreds were evacuated and one man was hospitalized.

Social media users were understandably alarmed by the magnitude of the fire, and photos of the incident quickly spread — looking more like a scene from an action film than anything else. The crash, which could contaminate the entire local water supply, is more than just a West Virginia-specific disaster: It's a reminder that we still have not figured out a safe way to transport oil.

(Excerpt) Read more at refinery29.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Local News; Politics
KEYWORDS: energy; oil; rail
Time to start laying some Pipe..
1 posted on 02/18/2015 5:09:45 AM PST by ABN 505
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ABN 505
Time to start laying some Pipe..

Laying pipe? That is by far the safest way to transport oil. If we did that, environmentalists would have to work harder to find an excuse to complain. They could do it, but it might strain their tiny little minds.

2 posted on 02/18/2015 5:13:28 AM PST by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ABN 505

Until all the anti oil libs boycott any and ALL energy derived from oil, they are just noise. That means buses, subways, and most electricity because at a minimum the employees of that nuke plant arrive in gasoline powered vehicles. Until I see them living in a candle lit house, walking or growing their own food, I don’t want to hear their complaints. Oh, and no bicycles cause the manufacturing process creates harmful greenhouse gases. And those useless google searches cause the servers to work harder thereby creating more harmful emissions


3 posted on 02/18/2015 5:21:53 AM PST by Josa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ABN 505

Initially, when I first saw this event on TV, I was in the other room. Couldn’t hear what was going on and thought it Russian shelling of Debaltseve, Ukraine...


4 posted on 02/18/2015 5:23:40 AM PST by donozark (On the other side of fear lies freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ABN 505
"It was carrying more than 100 tons of crude oil..."

Epic fail, Laura.

Since a rail tanker car carries roughly 30,000 gallons +/- of liquid (at about 7 lbs. per gallon) and there were 109 cars in this train, it had over 11,000 tons of crude aboard.

The rest of the article is just as absurd.

5 posted on 02/18/2015 5:31:45 AM PST by SnuffaBolshevik (Enter something.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SnuffaBolshevik

Strictly speaking, 11,000 IS more than 100, I suppose.


6 posted on 02/18/2015 5:39:36 AM PST by SnuffaBolshevik (Enter something.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SnuffaBolshevik

The author is a real ignorant idiot to equate rail accidents to pipeline leaks, then conclude “The President hasn’t said he opposes the pipeline overall — just that he doesn’t want to sign the bill until a State Department study of its safety is finished. Which seems like a good idea.”

It’s been the subject of dozens of studies going back a decade or more. Obama isn’t waiting for a study to certify its safety — he’s killing fossil fuels. End of story..

But I don’t go to blogs about fashion, beauty, wellness, and other goofy irrelevant things for hard engineering analysis.


7 posted on 02/18/2015 5:40:34 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom (For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do not, no explanation is possible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ABN 505

time to start laying pipeline when that great liberal savior of mankind Warren Buffet invests in it, instead of in Burlington Northern (check out the history, what did he know, when did he know it)


8 posted on 02/18/2015 6:05:03 AM PST by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ABN 505
I don't understand why the DC crowd we elected isn't all over this, DEMANDING that pipelines be built to transport oil. We need the roads and rail to transport agricultural products and people. My gosh, you'd think the tree huggers would be demanding that Keystone and other pipelines be built.

Nobody is in charge of common sense anymore.

9 posted on 02/18/2015 6:11:14 AM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
There may be some more to think about herein. Since there _are_ scores of hundred billion dollars being poured into USA by foreign nations. Did a small portion of this money fund a train accident? Could it?

Does not this huge amount of money influence or more likely control USA environmental policy and related groups? Does this huge amount of money not do just about anything it wants within USA? ...changing the word jihad into extremist, pointing the finger at real USAians instead of people of the pieces and immigrants with beliefs alien to USA?

10 posted on 02/18/2015 6:33:07 AM PST by veracious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ABN 505

“It’s a reminder that we still have not figured out a safe way to transport oil.”

Actually, we have. It is through a PIPELINE.


11 posted on 02/18/2015 6:54:50 AM PST by woodbutcher1963
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ABN 505

In the Canadian oil sands, bitumen produced by surface mining is generally upgraded on-site and delivered as synthetic crude oil. This makes delivery of oil to market through conventional oil pipelines quite easy.


12 posted on 02/18/2015 7:11:33 AM PST by jyro (French-like Democrats wave the white flag of surrender while we are winning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ABN 505

Of the gazillion miles of existing oil pipelines that have been in use starting when? Over a century ago? The author fears “two dozen” leaks?

If the history and performance of the trans-Alaska pipeline provides any example, it is that we *must* transport by pipeline as much as possible!

The author is a coward. He should just come out and reveal his true agenda: destroy the oil industry to trigger economic collapse and usher in a socialist paradise.


13 posted on 02/18/2015 7:23:05 AM PST by jaydee770
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grania

It tells me the railroaders are better crony capitalists than the pipeline builders.

In DC, and especially with the Chicago Mob, it ALWAYS follow the money.


14 posted on 02/18/2015 7:25:09 AM PST by nascarnation (Impeach, convict, deport)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson