Posted on 02/02/2015 4:54:37 AM PST by marktwain
A gun law reform bill, HB1116, has been introduced into the South Dakota house. The bill has 28 co-sponsors. The house has 70 members, 58 of which are Republicans, and 12 Democrats. 36 votes will be needed to pass the bill. In the Senate, there are 27 Republicans and 8 Democrats, a bit tighter ratio. The South Dakota Governor is Dennis Daugaard, who has been in office since 2011.
Governor Daugaard vetoed a constitutional carry bill in 2012, citing concerns of law enforcement officials. In 2013, Governor Daugaard signed a bill that specifically allowed school districts to determine if teacher would be armed in their schools, with the permission of local law enforcement.
HB1116 cleans up language in the current statutes, removes references that require guns that are carried without a permit to be unloaded, and makes certain that people from other states, who have concealed carry permits, will be able to carry in South Dakota, if they follow South Dakota law. From the bill:
Section 8. That § 23-7-7.4 be amended to read as follows:The bill would strike the language that would render an out-of-state permit invalid when the holder of the permit became a legal resident of South Dakota.
23-7-7.4. Any valid permit to carry a concealed pistol, issued to a nonresident of South Dakota, is valid in South Dakota according to the terms of its issuance in the state of its issue, but only to the extent that the terms of issuance comply with any appropriate South Dakota statute or promulgated rule.However, if the holder of such a nonresident permit to carry a concealed pistol becomes, at any time, a legal resident of South Dakota, the provisions of this section no longer apply.
The availability of a permit to carry a concealed pistol pursuant to the provisions of this chapter may not be construed to impose a general prohibition on the carrying of a pistol without such permit or the recognition of out-of-state permits to carry a pistol openly or concealed and loaded or unloaded.There may be other statutes that impose limitations on carry outside of the concealed carry law. No legal analysis of the bill was found.
This is what happens when too many Californians move to your state.
2/3 vote needed there to override a veto. Are those votes there if the bill passes?
This bill looks to be loosening restrictions, not tightening them.
I hope that bill passes as I cross So. Dak. often and “carry”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.