Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Wolfie

Why should “health insurance” be connected to employment?
That’s just an artifact of union bargaining during WW2 to circumvent wartime wage controls.


17 posted on 11/17/2014 2:09:18 PM PST by nascarnation (Impeach, Convict, Deport)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: nascarnation

Exactly, and this is the problem that needs to be solved, because the days of steady employment are coming to an end, due to globalization and technological advances.


18 posted on 11/17/2014 2:11:00 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: nascarnation

I don’t think it has to be. But I won’t work for a company that doesn’t provide it as part of the compensation package.


25 posted on 11/17/2014 2:47:18 PM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: nascarnation

People who get benefits through their employer don’t really understand the full cost of their health care. They focus on their premiums and out of pocket but corporations subsidize much of that. The formula I used at work for “fringe benefits” is 28% of the employees salary. So for somebody making $60,000 a year, we are putting $16,800 towards their health care and that is not including the premiums and deductibles that the employee is paying. All in, the total cost of health care for a typical employee is around $2,500/mo.


30 posted on 11/18/2018 1:46:44 PM PST by SamAdams76 ( If you are offended by what I have to say here then you can blame your parents for raising a wuss)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson